No, but I will do a victory dance on the roof tops when Fred Thompson does!!
2007-05-16 14:37:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
i will't be. Rudy does no longer help abortion. He basically would not believe this is any of the authorities's corporation. I agree. And in case you're taking care of to appoint someone too far to the right, you're making certain a victory for the liberals. There are not to any extent further adequate ideal wingers to win. and do not tell me about Reagan. He become the finest president of the 20 th century, yet he become no ideal-winger. He turned right into a mainstream conservative, that's why he become able to win a lot help from the Democrats. yet Reagan by no ability did a lot about abortion. in preserving with annum, he positioned forth a token invoice, which he knew had no danger of passing, and except that, it wasn't an difficulty to him. So once you awaken on Wednesday morning, November 5, 2008, and also you listen "President-choose Hillary Clinton," or "President-choose Barack Obama," do basically not overlook that the only Republican who would have defeated both of them, did not get the nomination because he did not opt to arrest women people and medical doctors keen on abortion. Vote for Rudy! (earlier this is too previous due)
2016-10-18 08:27:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by eth 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's just what this country needs, another nut in the white house...why not? after all, if a democrat wins we'll get attacked by terrorists...but they attacked a Republican state with a Republican governor...oh well, as long as he keeps saying 911, I'll be happy...and I'm sure the families of the firemen who died on 911 will be happy also. After the sacrifices they made, he thoughtfully had the Dept of Sanitation use the rubble to fill potholes and landfills in NYC, before they could sift through and search for the remains of the 1000 people still missing. Well, they're not really missing, they're filling potholes and trash dumps. I'm sure he had the cities best interests at heart. oh yeah, 911
2007-05-16 20:03:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by jerseygyrrl 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yeah BOBUCK your just another Left-Wing -Nut, Blame Rudy for 93 WTC or 9-11, Who was president Then? None other than BILL (I CHEAT ON MY WIFE SO VOTE FOR HER) CLINTON,
Maybe Bill should have stopped these terrorist attacks instead of foolin around in the oval office with a skank I wouldn't have touched in high school.
93 WTC
96 Khobar Towers 19 Airman dead 300 wounded.
98 2 U.S. Embassy Bombings in Africa
98 Sudan offered Bin Laden to Clinton declined
2000 U.S.S. Cole Bombing
9-11 it took 6 to 8 years to plan, organize, and train.
If those Terror attacks happened on Bush's watch you Left-wing nuts would be going crazy but since they happened on Clinton watch it's okay, YEAH ANOTHER CLINTON IN OFFICE JUST WHAT WE NEED, GO RUDY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-05-16 17:01:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by dez604 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Since I am not American, it really makes no difference to me.
However, I would urge people to remember that just because he was cool in a crisis during 9/11 & its aftermath & is clearly a good "people person", it doesn't necessarily mean he will be a good President.
He has a few controversial ideas which may not be easy to live with for some people.
2007-05-16 19:10:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by monkeyface 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
absoluetly. the man is the strongest leader in the pack for election. he fits all of my ideals and my beliefs.
if ******* hilary clinton wins i am moving to canada. we will be attacked. she cannot run this country and no other country (especially the ones we are fighting) are going to respect us. hell she couldnt even manage her own husband let alone a country. and i am a woman so i can say that without being sexist. america and the world are not ready for a woman president.
2007-05-16 18:30:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by Audrey 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
A national candidate that doesn't have the backing of the NRA and its multitudes of active mainstream voters would face a severe handicap in such a polarized environment so I doubt greatly I'll ever know (thank God!).
2007-05-16 16:53:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by Caninelegion 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Happy is a tough word use. However, I would definately be unhappy is Hillary Clinton becomes president.
I Rudy gets elected, I will feel secure.
2007-05-16 14:38:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by marleyfu 4
·
4⤊
1⤋
That is a BOLD prediction. I don't think he has a chance at it IMHO. He has flipped and flopped more than a fish out of water. He should have stuck to one position from the start.
Michael
http://www.supremecenterhosting.com
2007-05-16 15:47:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by Michael D 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Oh no, another four years...Giuliani says what you want him to say not the way he thinks..
2007-05-16 14:45:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by xyz 6
·
0⤊
1⤋