You have said it all.I agree with everything you have written. Great Question.For you a star.
2007-05-16 13:07:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by ♥ Mel 7
·
5⤊
4⤋
Oh WOW!!!
I read this blog( http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-so6etooyd... )
And I must say it is a true INSPIRATION from GOD.
As I was reading this my eyes and heart filled with so much emotion. More truth that can not be denied. WOW, WOW, OH WOW. Thank you.
----------------------------------------
Now to answer your questions.
No I would not allow anyone to redistribute my wealth. They would get a fight.
They are cutting all National Security, for the soul purpose of making it easier to control the Amer-ICAN people and turn us into Amer-ICAN'T people.
By shutting down conservative voices in America would make it easier for them to completely change our Constitution.
The socialists are the "Enemy Within" and as they try to keep their secret agendas (because they know the American people would fight them), they redirect their secret plans and make false claims against the G.O.P, President G.W.Bush, the conservatives and the Christians. They are trying to make it look as thou all who disagree with them are guilty of crimes against humanity and natural growth.
They NEED to go. They are trying to take us in a direction that has destroyed many other countries. Our Founding Father's made this posible through our Constitution,"that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. "
2007-05-17 03:15:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by Cheryl 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
ok enable me clarify this slowly in small words so which you realize..... once you open commerce(decontrol) with international locations that have a decrease forex fee, activity start to flow away for the rustic with a decrease forex fee. One countr will become the donor u . s .(u . s . dropping jobs) and the different will become the recieving u . s .(u . s . with decrease forex fee gainig the jobs). whilst the jobs flow away the donor u . s ., people lose their jobs in the donor u . s . as they are won in the recieving u . s .. This creates a topic in the donor u . s . the place hard paintings supply exceeds hard paintings call for in the donor u . s .. This motives wages to fall. whilst wages fall the earnings of the people incomes those wages loses p.c.. with expenses of living. this suggests as expenses of living grows, the greenback volume that measures poverty additionally grows, mutually as further and further people experience wages that are falling into poverty point. so as you are able to assume on your limitless information, poverty is a trailing factor that follows in the back of commerce deregulation and outsourcing of jobs because it did in Europe in the Fifties. It additionally must be predicted that commerce deregulation finally leads to a a techniques better call for in social classes because it did in Europe in the Fifties. This has been the present state of the yank monetary device each via fact Reagan proposed deregulating commerce in the Eighties.
2016-10-05 05:16:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by faim 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I can reframe your disdain for other viewpoints very easily. Let's see...
What has the new Congress accomplished so far?
I know:
-They tried to roll back the tax cuts for the wealthy so that money for imperative American programs and projects and keeping a balanced budget, and instituting a 21st Century minimum wage that for the first time in decades can truly be called a living wage and on some of that, they succeeded.
-They have tried to increase funding for the war in Iraq, with standards and benchmarks. Despite public support for an exit strategy, or at least a change in direction, every Congressional attempt to institute this change has been thwarted by the stubbornness of President Bush.
-The new Congress has shown a light on the many ways the Bush administration has tried to destroy and abolish the US Constitution and how the GOP Congress of yore rolled over for him. They have also fought back against attempts to ban civil rights for all Americans and run roughshod over the first amendment by the previous GOP Congress as a means to a political ends.
-The new Congress has strengthened ethics regulations in their halls so that scenes like the previous culture of corruption do not reappear.
The Democratic Congress are the vanguards of our civil liberties and American values, as far as I see it. They are the only ones with the power to fight back against the executive branch and its malfeasance, and they have been. The people who need to be stopped were rebuked last November as far as I can tell.
See? My point was to show how easy and yet important framing is to a discussion. I hope your next questions at least aren't so vitriolic.
2007-05-16 13:21:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by prezalex87 2
·
3⤊
3⤋
Graniting amnesty to all the illegals here is another step toward socialism.
Increasing the minimum wage is another step toward socialism.
Increasing Medicare, Medicaid, SSI, Welfare, ADC, Earned Income Credit, Increased taxes, Gun Control - all contribute toward Socialism.
Free College, Free Health Care, Farmer Subsidies, etc. - all contribute to Socialism.
We are well on our way as our population diversifies with illegal immigrants.
2007-05-16 13:09:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by SnowWebster2 5
·
1⤊
4⤋
Well, they've been TRYING to end this ridiculous blood bath in Iraq but the stubborn dictator won't let them.
2007-05-16 13:13:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by Dash 4
·
2⤊
3⤋
Failed Civics 101, eh? Bummer.
2007-05-16 13:19:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by The Man In The Box 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
Pork and ,more Pork, holidays and vacations and disrupting America
2007-05-16 13:15:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Ha.....Ha....Ha....Very bright, articulate, and perceptive you are. No, wait.......thats a lie. Lame, thats what you are. LAME!
2007-05-16 13:07:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by PoopsMagee 2
·
2⤊
4⤋
I'D RATHER HAVE TALIBAN NEIGHBORS THAN LIBS
2007-05-16 13:13:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by Son of George Bush 2
·
1⤊
4⤋