Are Most Liberals still opposed to Nuclear power?

Question

If gas goes up to 6 dollars a gallon would you rather have a new oil refinery or a nulear power plant? You know we arent going to have alternative fuels completely replace oil anytime soon.

Answer 1

Actually many liberals ARE supporting nuclear these days, not because of gas prices, but rather because we are FORCED to...

Nukes have zero carbon emmisions

like nukes could replace oil???

Answer 2

A good question. I don't know--so I'm just speaking for myself. I think its pretty clear that nuclear power has great advantages environment-wise--the catch is what happens if something goes wrong.

Nuclear power has a great safety record--the only serious incidents have been Three Mile Island 9which was contained in time) ahd Chernobyl--which killed tens of thousands of people. But with hundreds of plants working over the last 4-5 decades, that's a very good record.

The flip side, of course, is that if an accident does happen, its not just a localized disaster--but a widespread catastrophy. However--a lot was learned from Chernobyl. My opinion (and I do have an technical background, though not in that field) is tha twe can engineer containment systems so tha teven such a full meltdown can be contained.

So I personally have no objection per se to nuclear power. I do have a real concern about proper oversight and regulation, given the current lack of ethics displayed by many corporations and the even greater idiocy we are subjected to by government bureaucracies.

In other words-if the job of building and running nuclear plants is done right--we'll be fine. But--do we want a combination of Enron and FEMA playing with nuclear power? The very thought is enough to make you glow in the dark!

Answer 3

this is a terrible question.

Liberals SUPPORT nuclear power because its not oil. We dont have cars that run on nuclear fuel either so your ideas are just plain wrong.

We are opposed to nuclear weapons because that kind of power is just too dangerous to have in the world, and if you do a little research or study international relations at a college level, you will learn that nuclear weapons acually lower your state's security because it attracts intimidation and fear from your neighbors.

Just look at a map and you can trace the nuclear countries border to border from the Soviet Union all the way to Iran. Seriously, Soviet Union-China-India-Pakistan, take a quick jump across the red sea, Iraq tried to develop them in the 1990s (not in 2000 those were just lies, they were being very closley watched by the international community), and then finally Iran. You can also start with the U.S if you like and trace it through Alaska which is pretty close to Russia's eastern border.

Point is if you have nuclear weapons, your neighbor will soon have htem too.

Answer 4

Not all liberals are environmentalist whackos. It is the extreme environmentalists that have kept nuclear power frozen. As for the oil refineries, it's the oil companies that are holding back that issue. The current refineries could improve their output efficiency, but there is no motivation to do so. If they start to get strained, then they just jack up the pricing and skip capital expenses. We get screwed, and they get rich.

Answer 5

Everyone is pro-nuclear power, just not in their own backyards.

Nuclear is unfortunately, the only viable alternative to fossil fuels that we have right now. Hydro electric is almost at maxium capacity, while wind & solar may one day be able to approach it, but both still need massive amounts of government and private investment.

Answer 6

its funny, the progressives claim to be progressive, Nuclear energy is the way of the future. And they are against it.

France and Japan have 80% of their power from Nuclear, we are only 20% nuclear.

sigh, I guess the intelligetsia in this thread fail to realize that we burn fossil fossil fuels for industrial power. If we had more nuclear reactors, we could use more fossil fuels for transportation, instead of burning it for industrial power.
"duh we dont use nuclear cars!!" is this what the public education system has done to people?

Answer 7

You seen any nuclear plants being built lately?

I don't know about 'most liberals' but the environmentalist lobby has kept Nuclear power frozen for 30 years, and they're not showing any sign of softening that position.

Answer 8

Liberals or whoever... i will't think of what their political association concerns. have you ever finished any study in any respect on the subject rely? I took a school path some semesters in the past and our professor spent a pair of month on the priority. the charges are astronomical. And as quickly as I say astronomical, I mean magnificent. do somewhat study on the priority and you'd be surprised. human beings have all of those pie-in-the-sky techniques, yet costs would desire to be coated. to not point out the charges in assessment to the quantity of time it would take to end them and get them working. And whilst they're down... they're down. and that they take an prolonged time to means back up. Then there are the risk-free practices themes. i ought to pass on and on.

Answer 9

Of course they are . Liberals are always mystified by science they can't understand. Most liberals have gotten their info about nuclear power from an old jane fonda movie (China syndrome). You also fail to take into account that liberals would just love to force all working class people onto mass transit. That fits their view of how society should be structured, with only the few elites able to afford private transportation and all the rest of us dependent upon the government for our transit needs.

Answer 10

This liberal isn't at all opposed to nuclear power.

And I used to live one mile downwind from a nuclear plant. I now live twenty miles from it. It's always been a good neighbor.