The reward for bin Laden is millions, and our troops are worth a lot more than him.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070516/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_missing_soldiers
2007-05-16 08:34:56 · 6 answers · asked by Darth Vader 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Good question. I think we should take away the reward for OBL, maybe it would show how much we don't care about him, which could lead to him making a mistake.
As for the captured GI's, a reward seems like it would be useless. Sorry to say, but when have these islamic fanatic's ever not destroyed a male infidel when they've captured one (not including women).
I am truly sorry that the GI's were captured, but feel their fate is sealed. I'm hoping against hope that I am wrong! If not, it is just another reason why I think these animals should be eliminated.
2007-05-16 08:48:53 · answer #1 · answered by ggraves1724 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The military is being forced to be more frugal because of the delayed funding bill?
Seriously, though, it might be that there's an expectation that the people who know here bin Laden is are fewer and more loyal, and require a much larger bribe to tempt.
2007-05-16 15:39:36 · answer #2 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
When people go to fight the war, they don't go for the money but because they love this country.
2007-05-16 15:38:11 · answer #3 · answered by Liberal City 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
maybe it's just because rewards don't work.
I don't think it would matter to those arabs if it was millions or hundreds of thousands.
2007-05-16 15:41:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
isn't 200,000 way more than 0?
2007-05-16 15:39:32 · answer #5 · answered by logical_christian 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO WAR FUNDING!!!
2007-05-16 15:38:38 · answer #6 · answered by hazard to your heath 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋