Do you know what communism is?
Did you know that the only white people who stood up to the KKK in a formal protest were communists? That wasn't too long ago either... Nov. 3 1979... Greensboro Massacre... KKK killed 5 Communist Workers for demonstrating to remove the KKK from local community protection.
http://chronicle.com/weekly/v50/i19/19b00801.htm
So, really... are you just saying that you are more like a KKK member than a liberal?
Nice....
2007-05-16 07:57:00 · 13 answers · asked by rabble rouser 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
"Did you know that the only white people who stood up to the KKK in a formal protest were communists? That wasn't too long ago either... Nov. 3 1979... Greensboro Massacre... KKK killed 5 Communist Workers for demonstrating to remove the KKK from local community protection."
Now you know why these cons hate the liberals. We stood up to their hate then and we stand up to their hate now.
They hate anyone who stands up to their hatred, even if it is fellow conservatives.
BTW, you're going over their heads with this question. Especially since they don't understand the difference between Nazi's and Communists. They don't even understand the difference between our Democrats and Socialist. And, they don't even know what Socialism is. They are ignorant enough to think Hillary is a Socialist when in fact she's another big corporate freeloader politician whose last elections were funded by Rupert Murdoch the owner of Fox. Needless to say, they are truly a confused bunch.
2007-05-16 08:08:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
You are a dumbass if you think communists are any better than the KKK. Now granted, the commies who stood up to the KKK were different than most, but think of Lenin, Stalin, Ceausescu. These men let millionis die of starvation while them and their many government officials lived in their luxurious palaces. So, you being a communist isn't the best idea.
2007-05-16 08:07:18 · answer #2 · answered by fusion_xgen 1 · 3⤊ 1⤋
"Liberal" or "Conservative" are purely titles defining a particular political bent and not something extra. each and every celebration will attempt to vilify the different in any way they'd. the situation is it gets to be hypocritical and finally it fairly is "the pot calling the kettle black" because of the fact the asserting is going. it is purely what politics are and continuously would be. they are starting to be fairly nasty interior the previous couple of administrations. although, in case you controlled to pay interest in college and function study something regarding history, from stable ingredients it is, you will locate it has continuously been like this ...nasty. means shifts to and fro between the events. all and sundry attempting to get the top hand and cling onto it. What I even have observed is that the elected officers on the two sides care much less approximately their components who voted them into place of work and extra approximately preserving those soft government jobs. They spend maximum of their time engaged on getting re-elected. they provide the impact of being for favors with supplies linked. all of us pay the value for many human beings of that corruption. Soooo, according to danger the words liberal and conservative at the instant are not lots insulting as they're grimy words. i does not be too pleased with the two one.
2016-11-04 03:19:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The truth is that the people who call themselves liberals are not actually liberals. Liberal originally referred to somebody who was for as little government as possible, which is called a libertarian these days.
Socialism is actually about as anti-social an idea as you could possibly come up with. It is a system built upon stealing property from somebody whom the socialist believes has too much of something and redistributing it to somebody whom the socialist believes has too little.
The only thing worse than what is called a liberal these days is a Neo-Con.
2007-05-16 08:35:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I thought the people that stood up against the KKK were Americans...
2007-05-16 08:01:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Would you agree that individual could be something else than KKK or communist?
2007-05-16 08:02:57 · answer #6 · answered by Mr. Beef Stroganoff 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Not at all, a socialist by any other name is still a socialist, like the old sayings says, if the shoe fits
2007-05-16 08:02:59 · answer #7 · answered by sealss3006 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Tell me what you expect from the government and I'll tell you the difference between a person who claims he's a liberal democrat and a socialist.
2007-05-16 08:07:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Neo-Cons generally use the terms Communism and Socialism because they have never actually read anything about Communism or Socialism. They get their generalizations from Rush and Coulter. Evidently, they prefer incorrect generalizations to facts. It explains a lot about their misguided policies.
I suspect most of them know as much about Communism and Socialism as they do of Fascism, Republicanism, Maoism, and Conservatism.
2007-05-16 08:00:15 · answer #9 · answered by Blackacre 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Socialism and communism are both just an extension of liberalism.
2007-05-16 08:20:16 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋