"The fact that it may be foreign-owned would not cause me to hesitate making a decision to work there, unless the firm was owned by a citizen of a country with whose political agenda I did not agree."
Thank you!
2007-05-16 06:58:44 · 7 answers · asked by chicagos_no_1 2 in Education & Reference ➔ Words & Wordplay
I would not hesitate to work for a foreign-owned company unless its home country had a political agenda that went against my principles.
2007-05-16 07:04:12 · answer #1 · answered by Kathryn 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"The fact that it may be foreign-owned would not cause me to hesitate in making a decision to work there, unless the firm was owned by a citizen of a country whose political agenda I did not share."
2007-05-16 07:05:54 · answer #2 · answered by Gustav 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would have not based my decision to work for a firm due to the fact that it may have been foreign-owned, unless, it was owned by a citizen whose political agenda I could not agree.
2007-05-16 07:15:07 · answer #3 · answered by juvie 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would be better written as:
I would work there, unless the firm is owned by a foreign citizen with whose political agenda I disagree.
(In the context, "would" implies a decision that has not been made; therefore, "cause me to hesitate making a decision" is extraneous.)
2007-05-16 07:20:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
"The fact that it may be foreign-owned would not cause me to hesitate making a decision to work there. However, if the firm was owned by a citizen of a country with whom I disagree with i would reconsider.
2007-05-16 07:07:57 · answer #5 · answered by bust15nutz 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would not hesitate on deciding to work in a foreign-owned firm unless the company was owned by someone whose political viewpoint clashed with mine.
2007-05-16 07:06:25 · answer #6 · answered by Jess 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I will say that it is a wordy sentence. Shorten it somehow.
2007-05-16 07:06:18 · answer #7 · answered by amcfan84 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋