Are most stars in the universe older or younger than the stars in the Milky Way?

Question

Are most stars in the universe older or younger than the stars in the Milky Way?

Answer 1

According to accepted theory... Galaxies condensed out of the primordial material at about the same time.... so I'd have to say that most of the galaxies are about the same age... its just our perspective of them that is skewed since the furthest galaxies have their light delayed by their extreme distances...

And, since the formation of their stars should have happened during the same period, most galaxies should have stars in the same age range as the Milky Way.

Stars in the Milky Way can range in age from 14 Billion years old right up to new born stars :)

Answer 2

A galaxy is an end stage in the evolution of the universe.
The stars closest to the galactic center are older than stars in the arms.
As we look farther out in space the stars should get older.
Most of the galaxies at great distances don't exist to-day.
I believe most stars in the universe are older than the stars in the arms of the milky way.

Answer 3

About the same. The Milky Way contains stars with a large range in ages. They range in age from "nearly as old as the Universe" in some of the globular clusters, to "born yesterday". The Milky Way is a fairly large galaxy that formed, like all fairly large galaxies, by the merger of many smaller galaxies in the early Universe. Most stars in the Universe are in galaxies pretty much like the Milky Way, and most such galaxies formed by mergers of smaller galaxies at about the same time, many billions of years ago.

Answer 4

A mixed bag. Some stars in the Milky Way are fairly old (as galaxies go, it's not the oldest), but there are many stars, both in the Milky Way and elsewhere that are quite young.

Answer 5

Neither...the Milky Way contains as much as a representative set of star ages as do most other galaxies in the universe.

Answer 6

i'm youthful besides, and that i frequently sit down on my roof merely to gaze on the sky day and evening. the celebrities might nicely be overwhelming! particularly once you recognize which you're seeing some mild it is years previous, yet basically seen to you years later simply by fact it is so a techniques away that mild takes years to commute! I watch all of the astronomy classes and consider all of the books i will get my palms on. I genuinely have a brilliant number of pastimes, yet this one isn't waning any. i elect to advise you watch the technology channel, national Geographic and Discovery for some solid astronomy classes to work out how involved you would be in astronomy. Tuesday nights are astronomy nights on the technology channel. additionally, you're able to discover you have a keenness for quantum mechanics and physics as I did. Theories like the string concept will blow your recommendations! there isn't something like being waiting to bypass right into a container (blackholes working example) in which you're unbound with the aid of known 'rules' of physics! I advise any e book with the aid of Michio Kaku; Stephen Hawking's Universer in a Nutshell and/or short historic previous of Time; something written with the aid of Neal Tyson, Brian Greene; and Einstein's unique writing of particular and time-honored relativity (you may get the e book at any e book save, merely stated as time-honored and particular Relativity. savor your famous guy or woman-observing!

Answer 7

Probably younger. The age of the milky way is close to the age of the universe.

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/earth_age_040817.html

Answer 8

Older, it is not even close. And the more we find, the younger we are. Reading anything on this subject is interesting. so I don't have a recommendation for you.

Answer 9

HOW DO ANYONE REALLY KNOWS .....SO HOW CAN YOU ANSWER A QUESTION THAT YOU DONT REALLY KNOW ABOUT.