Terrorism hasn't risen. It has been concentrated/focused! Yes A. Q. would love the coalition to pull out. They could both claim victory & tell the World that the US is a worthless allie. Every one that even questioned their ability to stand up against them would no longer.
No they don't have a plan. Give them for a moment they have actually taken the time to think thru one, they most likely wouldn't share it. They would worry that Bush might use it & do well. They would prefer that the Republicians loose than the 1st World win. Their logic escapes me!
2007-05-16 10:22:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by viablerenewables 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Well girlfriend it does appear that 19 Dems in the Senate did not go for the pull out today remedy. So they continue to mess with the money but lack the testicular fortitude to enact an ideological consistent remedy to the division in their caucus. Most libs demand surrender, however many are squeamish about the French syndrome. That is before Sarkozy
2007-05-16 09:25:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
of path terrorist exist. What an absurd assumption to think of that human beings, because of the fact of their political associate, do not believe it. Saving our fellow human beings lives, and saving this united states of america an excellent form of debt sounds so lots extra suitable then what we are doing now. Peace is often the extra suitable decision. it would have made extra experience then going right into a rustic that on no account held a risk to us. Iraq had not something to do with 9/11. Saddam did not enable any terrorist team into his united states of america, they're basically there now because of the fact human beings. Bush's advice and intel on the wmd's became into faulted to assert the least. you are able to say that he became into misinformed or you are able to say that he purposely lied, take your %.. i'd choose to think of that he became into purely misinformed even though it does not seem that way. (Say what you choose, it is purely my opinion.) yet as quickly as I agreed with you appropriate to the dems mendacity to us appropriate to the wmd's then i'd additionally say that they have got been lied to by applying Bush and his comprehensive administration. in spite of each and every thing, they have been those with all the help and the motives why we would desire to continuously have long gone into Iraq interior the 1st place. It wasn't congress who had to talk the President into warfare.
2016-11-04 03:07:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
In case you haven't heard, they are trying to wipe "Global War on Terror" out of the Government.
2007-05-16 06:54:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No
I would really like to add a lot more to expand on this, but the simple truth is, NO
the only plan they have is how to take control of AMerica
2007-05-16 11:04:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by rmagedon 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Iraq is why terrorism has RISEN the past few years. So the question should be "do democrats have a plan to stop the rise of terrorism?" Pulling troops just may help.
2007-05-16 06:53:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by jeb black 5
·
3⤊
4⤋
When will Bush, the Commander in Chief, get a plan for fighting terrorism?
2007-05-16 08:07:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by ck4829 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
Our government does, yes, indeed, and, we are represented by the Democratic and Republican party.
2007-05-16 07:09:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
yes...look it up. and come september when republican senators and congressmen start jumping from the "stay the course" ship, will you finally be allowed to admit the situation in Iraq is counterproductive?
2007-05-16 07:26:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by bilez1 4
·
0⤊
3⤋
Dems just want to surrender
2007-05-16 06:51:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by DeuceRider 3
·
3⤊
4⤋