it could be any arms - as long as you use them to kill babies.
2007-05-16 06:29:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
2⤋
That is a tuff question. I am a liberal. I don't care if you bear arms either way. I would rather in each case that you not abuse the right given to you. If your life is not being threatened by someone or something I'd rather you not shoot it. If you are not dying or might die then I'd rather you not have an abortion. The right to life is the right we all should have. The woman getting the abortion is going to get it rather the lib. condones it or not. The person who destroys life with a weapon is going to do that rather the libs. condone it or not. The democrats should not have to take the responsibility for young republican women who get abortions either. That is the reality. Both parties have women who get abortions. You know this. This isn't a party issue.
Abortion laws were to keep back alley abortions from killing needlessly and taking the lives of young innocent women and children without any other options. I am for saving both lives. Planned parenthood at least gives options.
I will defend myself and my family other than that I am against killing with a weapon or abortion.
I can't remember who said "the innocent child was killed before he knew he was a Iraqi" Wouldn't that be the same as killing an American child before he knew he was an American. One is for profit "oil" Just as awful or worse than an abortion.
2007-05-16 06:49:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by Hanlex 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I support your right to bear arms if you go through a complete back round check that includes mental illness screening. Honestly, equating the right to bear arms and abortion is beyond comprehension. Get off this subject already.
2007-05-17 03:40:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by ninaol 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am a Democrat and I know many Democrats and librals who have no problem with you or anyone else bearing arms. You have no right to an AK47 or Bazooka but for sport and basic protection of your life and property no problem if you have rifles, shot guns or even handguns. By the way you show idiocy when you are general and lump everyone under one category as exactly the same. I don't get your association with arms and abortions. How would they be used?
2007-05-16 06:32:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
The Dems would defend abortion before the second amendment rights of all American citizens.
2007-05-16 06:31:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by terry l 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
As long as they could create a program that would enable the taxation of the people bearing the arms.
2007-05-16 06:29:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by only p 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Technically scalpels and vaccum cleaners aren't really weapons fitting of a militia, despite the sharpness of scalpels. Still, of that's all you've got around when it's time to fight...
2007-05-16 08:27:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by Beardog 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe in our rights to freedom of speech yet your question is pretty lame. One u target lib & dems, prejudice and mix gun control with abortion? Kinda sick or stupid, sorry but I also have my own opinions. Answer a real question, I do, this one? No thank you.
2007-05-16 06:31:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by Mele Kai 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
Great question! Someone asked yesterday for reasons why abortion should be legal. No one could answer without ranting.
Oh, and perhaps we should talk about arming bears??
2007-05-16 06:29:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
2⤋
suited to bury the hatchet. weapons particularly are not all that solid. besides, struggling with basically ends up in greater struggling with. i could safeguard the perfect suited to bury the hatchet as a results of fact now and returned human beings purely could desire to make amends.
2016-12-11 11:14:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Like a flag, depends on which way the wind is blowing.
2007-05-16 06:31:18
·
answer #11
·
answered by ggraves1724 7
·
0⤊
0⤋