2007-05-16 05:53:40 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
No - Life is hard enough for children already. Believe it or not, I am not homophobic at all - I just think it is selfish for a gay couple to put a child in this situation. I feel exactly the same way when a woman of 55-60 has a child - it is selfish, and you are setting up a child for a difficult life.
2007-05-16 05:58:44 · answer #1 · answered by John Q Harris 3 · 3⤊ 5⤋
Yes, there are to many children in need of loving homes. What difference does it make if the couple are gay or not? It's not like being gay is contagious, nor does it mean a child will be abused! Everyone needs someone to love them, so yes, let those kids have a family! I bet the kids would rather be in a loving gay home than to be in foster care or an orphanage!
2007-05-16 05:58:06 · answer #2 · answered by wish I were 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I could care less what the sexual orientation is of a person, other than myself, and the girls I might happen to date. I would much prefer a gay couple adopting a child, rather than the "state" taking over and increasing my taxes for someone Else's mistake. For those "right to lifers", I say, before you criticize people for having an abortion, you should be required by law to adopt at least one of those unwanted children that you so righteously demand that they live.
2007-05-16 05:59:03 · answer #3 · answered by auditor4u2007 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
If gay couples were meant to have kids, then they'd be able to have sex and create one the way God intended. Obviously a man can't get a man pregnant (or vice versa with women) so no--they shouldn't be allowed to adopt.
Kids these days are fcuked up enough as it is. Growing up trying to explain to your friends why you have two mommies or daddies is stupid.
2007-05-16 08:11:35 · answer #4 · answered by brevejunkie 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it would be extremely unfair to a baby or child of any age to grow up and not know the love, differences, expectations, and overall attributes from having a male and female parent. God made it possible for only a man and women to conceive a child together for a reason. I don't believe God makes mistakes. He knows more than we can even try to learn and children are our futures. This is not to say a same sex couple would be mean, uncaring, etc. I just believe in the design God has provided us with, and yes this includes single parents by choice should not happen either.
2007-05-16 06:03:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
gay couples ought to certainly be waiting to undertake babies! Claiming in any different case is like asserting that there is something intrinsically immoral approximately homosexuality. From my own journey i comprehend that that's untrue. a number of the main loving, solid and compassionate couples I even have ever met are gay. there are various little ones who ought to earnings from people like them adopting. such countless little ones are floating aroung in foster care devoid of proper love and stability. The greater residences for them the greater useful.
2016-12-17 14:28:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I'm straight but everyone knows that gay couples make for a much more stable and caring environment for kids to grow up in then almost ANY straight home does... and none of this the kids will be gay because of the parents crap, kids have as much right to choose as the next guy.
2007-05-16 05:57:29 · answer #7 · answered by David J 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
yes i totally agree with it gay couple could actually be better in some ways but they are just normal parents just like a couple who is straight and shouldn't be shamed by others like the way it has happened before
being in South Carolina knowing that the subject comes up every time we elect a new governor it seems as thou we are arrogant on the subject because the county i live in always elects the guy who is against gays in general
but then again most of them are good ol' boys
2007-05-16 06:04:37 · answer #8 · answered by damned_ugly4life 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I think anyone that can shows they are capable of being a responsible parent should be allowed to adopt ... I don't think sexual preference should even be a question asked
2007-05-16 05:58:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yes
Sexual orientation is not determined by choice. Its determined by nature of the person... (i think its genetic)
It's not their hoice to be gay so why ruin their lives by not allowing them to marry or adopt children?
2007-05-16 05:58:34 · answer #10 · answered by Lauren. 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋