Or would you say pee on in and just not bother to vote?
I would say pee on it. If that is the choice that I have...forget it!!!!!
2007-05-16 04:14:19 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Never NOT VOTE! This is a hard won privilege our country assures its citizens of having. Your vote COULD make a difference! You might think, "Well, it's just one vote.", but that's not true. There could be a lot of "one votes" out there and all totaled they can swing the results of an election. So by all means...VOTE!
You may not be happy with the candidates, but at least we have candidates. Vote for the best one out there, even if he/she is not your ideal.
If it comes down to Hillary or Rudy...to me neither is my ideal...I would vote for Rudy. I hate to say it, but Hillary is not a nice person. I have heard her lie repeatedly. She seems to say what she thinks her listeners want to hear and has a gift for sensing this. I don't think she has the best interests of our country in mind...more like it's the best interests of Hillary.
So...I would vote for Rudy.
Addendum: folks, read the question. No third party candidates have been mentioned here. It's a choice of either or.....
2007-05-16 04:28:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
First, let me just say this: There is no chance that it comes down to Giuliani and Clinton.
Hillary Clinton has been steadily loosing ground to both Obama, and Edwards in all Polling Reports and I believe that trend will continue. She is also one tounge-slip away from complete destruction.
Rudy Giuliani has way too many skelton's in his closet to even make it out of his own primary.. Sure, he seems like an electable candidate based, solely on the merit of how watered-down and weak the Republican nominees are, but he will eventually, IMO lose out to John McCain.
So, anyways - To answer: I would vote for Hillary Clinton.
2007-05-16 13:06:41 · answer #2 · answered by The Peav 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I'd write in my vote or not vote at all. As Lewis Black put it "The last election, we had a choice between two bowls of ****" and thats exactly what a Hillary vs Rudy election would be.
www.Gravel2008.us
2007-05-16 18:56:47 · answer #3 · answered by Jesus W. 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Don't be foolish,vote,even if it's for the lesser of the two evils,your vote is a precious thing.America needs a President,either,or, would be fine.It's the Senate and Congress that you should think about,and your local Representatives.Every day these people are making decisions that effect every one of us.Don't let thirty three percent of the people decide.If more people got involved in the voting process, I do believe we would get better people to vote for.
2007-05-16 11:50:59 · answer #4 · answered by song1709! 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'd vote for Rudy. Although, I wouldn't vote for a communist(Hilary).
She's against capitalism, and wants to tax the people and use the money for the common good. Republicans may not be perfect, but at least we aren't communists.
2007-05-16 11:49:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would not EVER vote for Hillary,so I guess my choice would have to be Rudy.
2007-05-16 17:24:42 · answer #6 · answered by Jan 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What a silly question. Rudy is not ideal, but he is not a very dangerous socialist like Hillary.
2007-05-16 13:03:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would vote NOT Hillary. No matter who is running against her, our military wont survive another Klinton. The last one downsized us by nearly 45% and now look at the problems we have with manning.
2007-05-16 11:23:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I would vote for Hillary, although i would rather see Chelsea be president. Seriously, neither would be my choice. As a registered democrat. my first choice would be Wes Clark..
2007-05-16 12:36:36 · answer #9 · answered by barbwire 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Rudy. The Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton thing just does not appeal to me.
2007-05-16 12:25:04 · answer #10 · answered by JB 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋