Peyton Manning. He knows how to run an offense better, heck, he is basically the Colts' offensive coordinator, and as he just proved last season, he can get the job done. I think Tom Brady was just a lucky recipient of an amazing system with an amazing coaching staff and a very solid team. Peyton Manning all the way!!
2007-05-16 03:37:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by mruniverse169 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
Manning hes better more talented and can do more
caser 92 is a morn first he wasted time writing tons about the same thing brady has recievers manning doestnt o thats funny because why didnt he doe nearly as good as manning when he had givens and branch and grahem also the patriots had two second round reciever and a first round TE so either belichek cant find recievers or brady isnt as good as it seems another thing is about the chemistry brady could never have the chemistry manning has because he is not as football smart nor does he have near the work ethic manning has no one does o ya and drew brees seemed to do just fine when his recievers were a 7th rd rookie a 6th rd pick a 5th rd pick and a TE that i belive was also drafted late and is not very good atall o i almost forgot jon kitna and joey harrington 3 1st round pick wide recievers no production
2007-05-16 16:34:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by stu 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
ok my answer is brady. but for you people saying brady is just a product of the system with a solid team around him are you f#cking retarded. because no games have been played yet lets go back and not includ FA this year. three great receivers the patriots had.....none the best we had was troy brown (who i love and hope he comes back) and reche caldwell (decent, but we all saw the playoffs). then look at who manning had marvin,reggie,clark, and stockly. and only one of them is not coming back and they have a good rookie receiver to come in for him. now look at what brady did with nothing...........and now look and see peyton has always been surrounded by talent giving them loads of chemistry and they still had to cheat using pass interference calls just to get to the Superbowl. im sorry but to say brady has the talented receivers that manning doesn't have is stupid. every year the pats have new receivers that aren't the best (except this one) and no chemistry, but peyton and marvin have always been together and reggie and clark have been there too so no one can say they don't have chemistry, actually people talk about how much chemistry they have.so peyton manning surround by talent for years and has to cheat to a Superbowl where he steals the MVP from one of the two running backs just because every one felts sorry for him. then tom brady never has any talent and still has three Superbowl rings as young as he is. some people say he cheated using the tuck rule, but evn if you took that away he still is better then manning, more rings more skills more everything. so i would rather have brady under center anyday. and you people say brady is a cry bag (where is that from) and manning is a Superbowl winng qb. hello how many rings does tom have. and manning is not the best now or ever ok people.and he never will be, he does not have the greatest arm and he won't see another Superbowl. if anything he is the product of the system. just wait until his receivers are gone then we will see what happens. on madden 07 i gave manning all second rate receivers like the pats had. the colts lost every game but the pats still came though, funny how you people can mix up who is better.ok people brady is more accurate and better at getting the ball into tight spaces. also how can some of you say he blew most of his chances and manning never does, are you kidding me, like i said before look at his receivers and how long it took, i call that blowing chances. then look at brady besides once where has he blown his chances??? anyone anyone. thank you and good night.
2007-05-16 15:46:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Brady.
Unless you have all-star receivers.
We've never seen Manning without good receivers, linemen, RBs, etc.
Check out the leading receivers for SB36:
New England No. Yds. LG TD
Brown 6 89 23 0
Redmond 3 24 11 0
Wiggins 2 14 8 0
Edwards 2 7 5 0
Patten 1 8 8t 1
A.Smith 1 4 4 0
K.Faulk 1 -1 -1 0
Who are those guys?:)
2007-05-16 12:22:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Manning got the best of him last year but ,I still have to with Tom Brady, what he did against the Rams in the last drive of Super Bowl 36 was to me the greatest drive in Super Bowl history,dont get me wrong I think Manning is one hell of a QB, one of the best but When it comes to crunch time with everything on the line Ill take Brady anytime, because hes proved himself alraedy on several occassions...Just keep this in mind, last year Tom Brady led the Patriots with in one drive away from yet another Super Bowl and he did with a second rate group of recievers
2007-05-16 14:10:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by RICHARD M 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Brady, every day of the week and 3 times on Super Bowl Sunday
2007-05-16 13:04:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
brady i love manning but brady never buckles under the pressure hes the most reliable qb in the NFL
2007-05-16 10:44:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by Paul Collie 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Manning.
The reason Peyton Manning is so successful is that he is in control of every situation. He has made himself an elite QB by recognizing defenses and calling the play that will be most effective against the defense.
Brady, while an awesome QB and one of the greatest, is more of a product of a system. He is excellent, but not the preparer and dominator that Manning is.
2007-05-16 10:44:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by JMK 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
manning over brady all day. brady cry's to much about things and manning is a superbowl winning qaurterback with a great arm and decision making. i'm not really a big fan of either but manning over brady anyday.
2007-05-16 11:02:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
At this point I would still take Tom Brady. I think he makes his players better.
Now ask me this question at this time next year and my answer may be different.
Thing is - you can't go that far wrong with either of them.
2007-05-16 11:01:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by Mike S 3
·
0⤊
0⤋