English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

and this is of my paper so if can just put PRO or CON

2007-05-16 03:27:36 · 24 answers · asked by knightbat 1 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

24 answers

I feel if a person is going to die a horrible death and they can determine a way to exit this world with some dignity then they should be allowed to.

2007-05-16 03:30:22 · answer #1 · answered by Bosspooba 5 · 2 0

Pro

2007-05-16 03:30:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Pro

2007-05-16 03:29:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Pro

2007-05-16 03:29:24 · answer #4 · answered by [ΦΘΚ] ﮎl4CK3R 2 · 0 0

pro

2007-05-16 03:36:41 · answer #5 · answered by richie 2 · 0 0

pro

2007-05-16 03:35:01 · answer #6 · answered by SuzeY 5 · 0 0

pro

2007-05-16 03:32:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

pro

2007-05-16 03:31:05 · answer #8 · answered by Meggerz 2 · 0 0

Boy what a tough topic to have picked. Is it right to keep someone suffering in pain and agony just because they can keep on living. I know I wouldn't want to continue to live like that especially if I had only a very limited time anyway. However, others are worried that we might be setting a bad example and start down a slippery slope of euthanasia and who gets to decide about those who aren't competent to decide for themselves.

2007-05-16 03:35:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

PRO - for those with limited life left, but not because people are in a bad place in their life. Good Luck

2007-05-16 03:44:00 · answer #10 · answered by mikehockstein 2 · 0 0

Pro. If the person is sound of mind and is 100% terminal and living in pain.

2007-05-16 03:31:24 · answer #11 · answered by Reported for insulting my belief 5 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers