Should the government crack down on smoking laws?

Question

Just answer yes or no. It's for an opinion poll in my government class. Thanks all!

Answer 1

your question cannot be answered correctly.
you need to re word it. it is confusing

should the government enforce anti smoking laws,
and create new ones?

No


if these answers your counting are going to be used as a result for your poll in class. understand that your data is incorrect. you might as well just make up the numbers

I suggest scratching this question (pick a best answer though) and try reposting your question correctly

I'll keep an eye out for your new one and answer it.

Answer 2

Not sure what you mean by crack down but here is a shot at it.

As far as smoking goes it is a personal choice- so no.

As far as smoking in public places you are not the only one there and you shouldn't be able to expose people to carcinogens against there will- so yes.

As far as cracking down on, oh say, people selling to underage and such, it depends on how they go about it- so with certain rules in place yes.

Sorry if this doesn't help out.

Answer 3

i think of the present situation with the drug conflict is all approximately furnish and insist and training relating to the actual risk of the greater solid drugs (ie no longer- marijuanna). The drug conflict decreases furnish which will improve the fee of drugs and availability. The gov't can on no account make all drugs legal in a loose for all (like say the regulations surrounding hamburgers) in the different case it quite won't remedy most of the subject concerns, there'll nevertheless be a lot of a similar issues yet they must easily legalize specific drugs in a fashion nearer to alcohol. Which despite if legal, continues to be tightly controlled. My ex-roomate replaced into dutch and despite if marijuana is legal it quite is merely legal to very own as a qualified save broking. there continues to be unlawful distribution that's prosecuted. additionally, all of the different greater solid drugs are nevertheless merely as unlawful as they are right here in the U. S. they have their very own drug conflict against the greater solid drugs. however till they make some new style of heroin, meth or crack that's no longer addictive there'll nevertheless be a undeniable point of violence, theft etc because of the fact the difficult center addicts will do something to get their restoration and it will nevertheless be difficult for somebody to kick the habit. I artwork in a significant city and that's no longer difficult to locate therapy classes yet drugs are nevertheless addictive which does no longer make it any much less annoying for somebody to kick the habit. The training is lacking in that people nevertheless do no longer understand that crack, heroin, meth, or acid can do everlasting harm from making use of them in basic terms some cases and can be addictive from the 1st cases somebody makes use of them. Plus, the actuality that's some strategies drug dependancy motives or a minimum of contributes to a lot of society's issues continues to be lost on many people.

Answer 4

The government should crack down on lying politicians!
And then go find the safety belts that are missing from the transit buses!
If they are really are that concerned about ones safety and welfare?

Answer 5

You really need to re-word this question.

Are you asking if the government should abandon anti-smoking laws or are you asking if government laws should be enforced against smokers?

I don't understand what you are asking.

Answer 6

Like others said, I'm not sure how to interpret your question.

I'm GLAD they just banned smoking inside public building in AZ.

Beyond that I don't really care what they do.

Answer 7

Crack down on smoking laws? Yes.
Crack down on smoking? No.

Answer 8

No answer, you didn't state what cracking down means.

Answer 9

I agree w/ Anthony Spears.
I can't tell from your question if that means yes or no.

Answer 10

yes