The ability to learn law and learn from the mistakes of others is somewhat lost when public litigation is replaced by alternative dispute resolution. Choose one of the following resolution methods, and defend why it is a good option for business: arbitration, negotiation, mediation, minitrial, or summary jury trail. Explain your reasons why sacrificing public litigation might be good for business.
2007-05-15 16:46:41 · 4 answers · asked by Other 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Public litigation, properly applied, is a good thing.
Public litigation, abused, is merely legalized theft.
The reasoning is simply that humans find it easier to steal resources from others than to earn them themselves.
2007-05-15 16:54:55 · answer #1 · answered by Boomer Wisdom 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
When the other litigator is the retail customer/little guy, then biz loves ADR. Why? Because the biz is a repeat player while the consumer is not. Therefore, biz starts to develop relationships with the mediators, etc (who want the repeat business). Relationships with the mediators makes the playing field no longer level but instead favors biz.
2007-05-15 23:52:11 · answer #2 · answered by Brand X 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Who cares about business? What about what's good for the People? We are clearly enslaved by the monopolistic mega-corporations and the World Bank. I say sue them out of existence!
2007-05-15 23:58:23 · answer #3 · answered by Paladin 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Your textbook will have excellent answers to these questions. Even listening in class would probably answer most of these questions. Good luck with not studying.
2007-05-15 23:51:59 · answer #4 · answered by lcmcpa 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋