Yes. Guliani hit him with a monster uppercut that got the biggest audience applause of the night.
When attempting to recover, his answer had nothing to do with Guliani's assertion.
Effectively, any chance or face he hoped to have coming out of this debate is now gone. He by far is the biggest loser and might as well fade off now before he looks worse.
2007-05-15 16:30:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by David B 1
·
4⤊
4⤋
Winners: Paul, Bachmann, and Santorum Losers: Perry, Gingrich, Romney.
2016-05-19 15:58:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't agree that we had it coming in the sense that we deserved it, but I would say that we certainly could have done a better job foreseeing an attack of some kind, even if not this particular kind. The failure to respond goes as far back as Jimmy Carter, and the failure to even notice the trend by the media goes on even today.
Had it coming, no, should have foreseen some kind of domestic attack, yes.
2007-05-15 16:05:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by open4one 7
·
5⤊
1⤋
Ron Paul is right, even Michael Savage said this on the day 9/11 happened.. Michael had been saying for years before 9/11 that one day we're gonna get attacked, we leave the boarders open and we get into business we shouldn't be getting into.. Everyone accused him of being a right wing nut..
Go figure..
2007-05-16 01:08:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Eyrothath 3
·
3⤊
3⤋
You guys are all hating on him...but what if he is right? huh?
Ever consider that our presence across the world is spawning all the hate we get? I bet you if we left everyone alone, we wouldn't have to worry about terrorism.
And just to set the record straight, Ron Paul has never said anything about 9/11 being an inside job. never.
2007-05-15 16:04:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
I am not a fan of Ron Paul or Fox News, so I don't know if Paul was set up by Fox, or just was off his game
2007-05-15 16:07:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by jean 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
yeah, I think Ron Paul was the big looser. I didn't know much about him until tonight, and it seems like he would be a better Democrat candidate. He had some legitimate points.
Oh how I wish Newt Gingrich would put himself in the race. He is the man who understands history and how it impacts our world and the decisions we make today.
2007-05-15 16:02:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by bwlobo 7
·
3⤊
5⤋
Sad, I actaully surrport Ron Paul and Kuchinich, Both great men, apposed to that blondhead clinton and osama obama ****..
We did have it coming, infact, I'm not even going to bring in my belief that "9/11 was an inside job" because I'll just get bashed for it by you brainwashed people.
2007-05-15 16:01:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by Lee M 1
·
3⤊
6⤋
I heard he said "purple yellow monkee".. LMAO!!
It's too funny how quickly you cons skew things..
So far he's winning the text message vote.. haha
2007-05-15 16:02:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
He never was a serious candidate. He belongs with the libertarians
2007-05-15 15:59:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by Chainsaw 6
·
1⤊
4⤋