English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

3 answers

It basically stated that separate but equal was constitutional.
In the case, Plessy, refused to leav ethw "white" car of a train. He was 1/8 white, but everyone considered him to be black. He argued that his rights were violated. The court said that separate but equal is fine.This lead the way to the Jim Crow laws. For decades, it was perfectly legal to separate the races in public and private places alike.
It was not until 1954 in Brown v. BOE was separate but equal reversed.

2007-05-15 13:58:53 · answer #1 · answered by YSIC 7 · 0 0

particular i think of the disaster in Pakistan will impression the consequence of the presidential race right here in the U.S. The terrible turn of activities will destabilize Pakistan and could make some Democrats think of: Is a incredible guy 3 years remote from the Illinois state Senate waiting to handle this mess? And it could make some Republicans think of: Mike loves Jesus greater suitable than any of the different men, yet McCain genuinely is conscious a ingredient or 2 approximately distant places coverage. With the Iowa balloting decrease than a week away, it style of feels possibly that the applicants with huge distant places coverage adventure are certain to earnings. different than for the candidate with the main adventure of all: Joe Biden, who isn't even on the radar from now on.

2016-11-23 16:02:22 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

It established the "seperate but equal" doctrine, which meant blacks and whites had seperate buildings, but they were supposed to be equal. It also led to a whole bunch of other cases, like brown vs. board, and pretty much sparked the whole civil rights movement.

2007-05-15 14:01:31 · answer #3 · answered by Nawgii 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers