http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,,2080239,00.html
2007-05-15 11:10:33 · 9 answers · asked by http://hogshead.pokerknave.com/ 6 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
Evil.
2007-05-15 11:13:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Evil, in my opinion. As has been said, the group he did lead was neither moral nor a majority.
2007-05-15 15:03:03 · answer #2 · answered by gortamor 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The word of God is like a two edged sword.
It cuts you going in and heals you coming out.
Dont condemn a man that follows his faith and covictions.
He didnt write the Bible only tried to tell its truths.
2007-05-15 15:41:43 · answer #3 · answered by Darren 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I don't refer to him as a force for good nor a force for evil. To me, he was nothing more than a force for intolerance, and we just don't need any more intolerance in America.
2007-05-15 11:29:56 · answer #4 · answered by rawrwg 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
He was Not a force for tolerance. He was a force for ignorance. May he RIP whatever that is for him.
2007-05-15 12:06:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Evil. He could not even spell moral, apparently!
2007-05-15 11:23:50 · answer #6 · answered by Avondrow 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
R U qualified to judge him??(or anybody else)! I am not but imo he was a good Christian man who served the LORD.
2007-05-15 13:21:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
"Evil" is probably too strong a word, he didn't murder or rape anyone himself; I just happen to think he was wrong, deluded and crooked.
2007-05-15 11:18:04 · answer #8 · answered by Lobster 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I dunno, but he scared the crap out of me. All TV evangelists do...lol
2007-05-15 11:14:11 · answer #9 · answered by when irish eyes are smiling 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋