Harry Potter 7?

Question

I heard some things, including giant squid is animagus Godric Griffindor, Horcrux in Room of R, Locket in grimmauld place Horcrux, ETC. I just want to hear anything else.....................PLEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASSSEEEE

Harry obviously dies. Some say he is a horcrux (kinda would explain the fact Vold. cant posses him)

PS: J.K. said Animagus thing

PSS: Dont say anything obvious or Stupid

Answer 1

My best guesses:

1. Harry is not a horcrux! (This idea makes no sense in light of the prophesy for one, and why would Voldemort put part of his soul into someone he might have to fight anyway).
2. Pettigrew still has a debt to Harry and that debt will be collected upon.
3. Neville will find his strength and confidence.
4. Bill Weasley's marriage will be the scene of a big fight, and maybe the death of one of the major characters.
5. Draco Malfoy will not be a major factor, unless he admits to himself that he is in over his head with the Deatheaters and turns coat.
6. We will find out that Harry is Dumbledore's heir, and among the things he gets is the pensieve and a bunch of very instructive memories.
7. Finally, about Snape:
Snape is Snape. He is beyond the sort of simplistic categorization as "good" or "evil", IMHO. I do believe he is not as evil as he appeared at the end of HBP. It would take too much space to really go into this in detail, but consider this:

It is well known that Snape played the double-agent prior to the death of Harry's parents, and there is no reason to believe he wasn't still a double agent on the anti-Voldemort side. Why then did he bind himself to the success of Draco's mission and then actually kill Dumbledore?
My answer: Dumbledore knew that destroying Slytherin's ring had fatally wounded him and Snape knew so too. Therefore he allowed himself to be bound to Dumbledore"s death, a death he knew was imminent and against which he knew Dumbeldore had taken precautions to ensure that his death would not derail the anti-Voldemort movement.

Now, on the other hand, if Snape has turned coats; why did he not kill Harry* or disable him and take him helpless to Voldemort? JKR made it clear that Harry is no match for Snape as a wizard (yet). If you look at Snapes "taunts" at Harry and put them into anyone else's mouth, they're very good advice on what Harry needs yet to learn to fight strong adult wizards on anything like equal terms.
My answer is that Dumbledore at some point shortly after Harry was orphaned made Snape take an unbreakable vow to protect Harry. This fits in perfectly with Snape's actions toward Harry in the books thus far. Yes, Snape is a mean SOB to Harry, but that is Snape's personality, and he didn't vow to be nice to Harry after all.

My conclusion is that in Book Seven, Snape will act covertly and eventually overtly to aid Harry, that he will likely live, and that Harry will be just as in the dark over Snape's motivations as when Harry entered Hogwarts. (BTW, the above is why I don't think Harry will die. If I'm right, then Snape dies too if Harry dies, and Snape is the ultimate survivor).

*My reading of the prophecy is that there is no requirement that either has to directly kill the other, just that one no longer lives, so I think Snape certainly could have killed Harry and talked his way out of it afterwards

Answer 2

Hello? Does Anyone here understand the concept of SARCASM? If Rowling was going to make the Squid Godric's animagus, she would not have joked about it in an interview. And no one KNOWS that Harry is going to die unless you happen to be Jo, or an editor, translator, or publisher. It will make me very joyous if she did kill him, but nothing is certain. Lastly, Whoever made the idiotic comment about the fifth movie, The books are a little further ahead, I suggest reading them.

Answer 3

The real problem with your question is that you are asking one without a real answer. Or, should I say, Only Rowling and a few select editors who work at the publishing house know any of the answers, and they are not about to spill the beans. If you are asking on a public forum for spoilers from the upcoming book, the best you are going to get is guesses. There will be no facts coming from the populus, as they don't know. Some of the millions of guesses might be right, but most of them are just going to be way far off the mark.

You are better off spending your time rereading the first 6 books for clues.

Answer 4

i'm a author, and you may take it from me. until J ok Rowling has lost her innovations, she can't kill Harry Potter. the 1st 3 books had variety of an uplifting ending. the subsequent 3 have been darker and ended no longer so stable. that is what writers do. You stick your important character in a tree and throw rocks at them, cause them to appear like they'll die, yet then you definately would desire to save them. Harry Potter will come out on suitable on the top of e book 7. i can't say an identical for his pals.

Answer 5

There is so much random BS circulating about the next book that JK Rowling is pleading for mercy in the newspapers today. She is concerned that some of it may be close-enough to the truth that it will ruin the story for readers.

Answer 6

if harry dies, i die. omg i so hope giant squid is godric gryffindor. i haven't been keeping up on 7th book updates because i get so intensely worked up and overanalyze everything. this time i'm just waiting for the book and hope it doesn't cause me to jump in front of a train.

Answer 7

Harry Potter does not die. thats until in the last one book . He is going to kiss a girl and voltemort is making an army

Answer 8

Harry is the 7th horcrux, and must be destroyed to permanently defeat "you know who".

Also, Snape is innocent!

Answer 9

heard that this will be the last harry potter book/movie, and harry does die at the end, killed by voldemort. SO I'VE HEARD ! ^_^ '

Answer 10

i heard in the news that she may make an eighth book, and all the money will go to charity. :]