Louis's efforts did not bring prosperity to the common people of France. His numerous wars and extravagant palaces effectively bankrupted the nation, forcing him to levy high taxes on the peasants. As the nobility and clergy had exemption from paying these taxes, the peasantry came to resent them. The peasantry also opposed the royal absolutism established by Louis. The French Revolution picked up on such sentiments in 1789.
Henri IV had brough religious tolerance with the Edict of Nantes, thus ending the Civil War in France. Louis XIV reversed this peaceful situation as the freedoms granted were taken away, one by one, with the final step -- the revocation of the "Edict of Nantes" in 1685 (Édit de Fontainebleau), by Louis XIV, roi-soleil de France -- the "Sun King" who brought gloom and despondency..
We forbid our subjects of the {Protestants} to meet any more for the exercise of the said religion in any place or private house, under any pretext whatever, . . . . [Paragraph II]
We repeat our most express prohibition to all our subjects of the said {Protestants}, together with their wives and children, against leaving our kingdom, lands, and territories subject to us, or transporting their goods and effects therefrom under penalty, as respects the men, of being sent to the galleys, and as respects the women, of imprisonment and confiscation. [Paragraph X]
2007-05-15 10:20:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Doethineb 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is no such thing as proof in history. It's not math. You can make an argument, but it's up to your opponent to find it convincing...
2007-05-15 10:18:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by NC 7
·
0⤊
0⤋