Why we are fighting in IRAQ? It's for there country? what are we getting in return, dead soliders and budget deficit. Why don't we get Iraq oil and fiance the war from there? Why to spend our money. While we busy fighting Iraq, Iran is on the verge of becoming neclear power. We all know that Iran supporting terrorist in Iran, why don,t we attck Iran If we need to stay in Iraq, and we want to win, why don't we attck iran? Helping terrorist is like attcking USA indirectly. I know people will say that because of world opinion we don't do that, but i thought Bush was a bold presidant? We are busy in war, china is ripping USA industries> Look at us dollor, low against all currencies. Can't things get worse than this? Why don't we impeach bush? Why can't we have base over there and let iraqi's fight and we support one group, who is faithful to us? Let the Iraq's fight among themslf. We are superpower, but it doesn't mean that we should let our soliders and waste our money.
2007-05-15 08:43:22 · 24 answers · asked by sumit_batra 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
When you actually learn the language of this country then you can comment on our President.
2007-05-15 08:54:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
He is no different than any other president. He just was put in a tougher situation and had big balls. He is only one man and bases his decisions off of briefings. I would of reacted the same way after 9/11. Alot of mistakes have been made but his intentions were golden. Our military cannot be spread any thinner by going into iran right now. I have the most simpathy for the soldiers because I am one, but in time of war people die. In comparison to other wars the losses are minimal. What we need is the support of the people at home. We are only doing our job just like everyone else does daily. We didn't impeach Clinton for being a moral idiot .
2007-05-15 09:01:44 · answer #2 · answered by Y 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Presidential approval scores began interior the previous due 20's, early 30's or so, to declare Bush is the worst in historic previous isn't particularly actual, in simple terms because of the fact the polls have been taken. Harding might have had dismal approval scores, as might some "determination" nineteenth century Presidents!
2017-01-09 22:14:10 · answer #3 · answered by garriga 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is not just Iraq that does it but Bush will, indeed be the worst president in US history. That title has been the sole possession of James Buchanan since the 1850s. The sad part is that Buchanan never really had the opportunity for greatness but Bush did and blew it. Lincoln, our greatest president followed Buchanan and is made even greater because of Buchanan's failure. One can wonder if the one that follows G.W. B. could come close to the greatness of Lincoln and how much better they will actually look because of the fact that they are following such a big failure.
2007-05-15 08:52:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
So we should only fight if we get something in return? Kind of like the Nazi's? You say "we", and either you have no mastery of the english language and are not well educated, or you currently reside in another country and are playing yourself off as American. "The dollar low against ALL currencies?" Are you insane?! The dollar pushes all currencies, don't let facts get in the way of your opinion though.
2007-05-15 08:55:09 · answer #5 · answered by Scott B 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
History has a way of vindicating Presidents who are unpopular during their time in office. Look at Truman. A very unpopular President during his two terms, but now he ranks up there with Washington and Lincoln. And speaking of Lincoln, he was also another unpopular President, barely winning re-election in 1864. Let history take its course---if the media doesn't try to influence it.
2007-05-15 08:50:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
In the race to be the biggest loser in American history....it's Bush by a nose as the worst president in American history.....and the conservatives go wild with their guy coming out on top........
and there a photo for 2nd between Herbert Hoover and RonOld RayGun
...it's a triple headed sweep of incompetence and evil for the conservatives.....
....please hold all tickets until it is decided if RayGun's "trickle-down" economics (peeing on working people) will eventually beat out Hoover's refusal to do anything while Americans starved to death during the Great Depression
Proud day to be a conservative
We'll be right back after a word from our corporate masters.......
2007-05-15 08:58:21 · answer #7 · answered by Peace Warrior 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No. Everyone seems to forget that when we first went into Iraq that the majority of congress and the majority of our nation was behind him. Not that we've found out it's going to be tougher than we thought , a lot of people are to weak squeamish to stick it out , and want to jump ship.
2007-05-15 08:54:44 · answer #8 · answered by jim h 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Our POS Bush by far exceeds the next to worst President we have ever had by a billion and a half light years!
The Gop should be sued and Americans should get a refund for having this chicken turd in the White House!
2007-05-15 08:49:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
History Channel survey of 400 historians rates Bush "worst president" in the history of our country.
.
2007-05-15 08:49:30 · answer #10 · answered by Raven 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋