I think that due to the enhancements in the technology of weapons that confrontation between two major powers will probably result in a sort of cold war. Both sides knowing full well that either country could kill millions in seconds.
2007-05-15 08:03:21 · 9 answers · asked by Glen E 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
You will if you was in world war 3 trust me, history will just call the "war in Iraq" Bush's stupidicy in History books. I mean a war between two countries that can cause damage to the other not a country that can barely defend itself. eg Iraq
2007-05-15 08:10:23 · update #1
i'm from England btw
2007-05-15 08:13:45 · update #2
Yes...I beleive iraq has brought the world to a point where the possibility of a world war is in the fate of 2 nations
Iran and Isreal, and how there relations will play out
It is no longer in USA's or Europes power to control
P.S this isnt 1962, this war will not end the world in 30 minutes like the Cuban missle crisis, nukes will be used, but in a limited fasion not a world ending one
2007-05-15 16:17:52 · answer #1 · answered by matt h 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only the US can stop the current arms race. It 's attempts to build a missile ring around Russia, its dangerous game against Iran, its efforts to proliferate nuclear weapons and to enlarge its already massive nuclear stockpile make the US the one culprit endangering the future of humanity. Bush's withdrawal from the ABM treaty is just a start, Call you representatives and ask them to join the international community in a global effort to achieve full nuclear disarmament. Also press your representative to accept China and Russia's repeated requests for a ban on space weapons.
WW3 is not inevitable. The US government has been hijacked by the arms dealers and it is the responsibility of the US citizenry to stop them. Call your representatives and raise hell, or accept the fault for ending human history.
2007-05-15 08:12:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
USA and what other power? Been there done that, we were smart enough not to use the weapons. The cost of keeping up with the USA bankrupt USSR.
China is the only viable nation to have another cold war against, with the USA being a major trade partner with them - tell me why they would threaten the US militarily?
The war to be battled is an economic one, not a military battle.
2007-05-15 08:11:42 · answer #3 · answered by Fester Frump 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
uhh we already had a cold war. the trend now tends to be the smaller countries giving us crap. so we gotta bust them in the head
i don't know with what weapons WW III will be fought with, but i know WW IV will be fought with sticks and stones.
Einstein
2007-05-15 08:07:09 · answer #4 · answered by Kevy 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"WWIII" is just a title. We could be in it right now, but history hasn't gotten round to calling it anything beyond "Bush's War for Oil" at this point.
2007-05-15 08:07:29 · answer #5 · answered by bradxschuman 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, we all have a choice Neo. However it is much easier to start wars than stop them.
2007-05-15 08:07:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
WWIII IS INEVITABLE!!!!!!!!!!!! We must be prepared. Oil supplies are dwindling, war could very well erupt over them. Look around, you will see.
2007-05-15 09:56:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
WW3 yes.....just have to sit and wait. Israel will be involved every nation will be involved...whether on Israel's side or not. It is inevitable.
2007-05-15 08:08:16 · answer #8 · answered by aulona37 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I think WW III is inconceivable!
2007-05-15 08:06:46 · answer #9 · answered by Double O 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋