“Her outrageous comments are inexcusable and should not be tolerated in the public dialogue.”
If this is ain't anti free speech, what is it?
http://thehill.com/campaign-2008/edwards-blasts-coulter-comes-to-obamas-aid-2007-05-09.html
2007-05-15 04:05:50 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Edwards is for free speech, if he is doing the speaking.
2007-05-21 08:08:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
John Edwards is also for the working people of course he gets 400 dollar haircuts and lives in a 28000 sq ft house don't we all need people like him to go to bat for us.
2007-05-22 10:34:12 · answer #2 · answered by victor m 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Again the rightwing nuts cherry pick a quote. He said that comments should not be "tolerated" he didn't say shouldn't be allowed. He spoke out against something he couldn't tolerate (as we all do...here mostly...well all the time).
2007-05-22 04:39:27 · answer #3 · answered by lxtricks 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He sure does. He charges $55,000 dollars to talk to a university about poverty. LOL. Like many democrats he does not want dissenters to speak. He is afraid of challenges.
2007-05-22 15:41:01 · answer #4 · answered by TAT 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree..................... If it benefits him or his agenda it's free speech. If it hurts his feelings then it isn't worthy of uttering. Sadly he's another hypocrite. I wonder what he thinks of Rosie O'Donnell, John Kerry and the other loonies who disgrace American heroes (Our Soldiers) unchecked and with the blessing of the far-left.
2007-05-22 00:54:29 · answer #5 · answered by Honee-Bee93 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What do you expect from a man who makes MILLIONS by
pretending to help the poor?
He's a typical hypocrite, a lawyer, a politician. Who could believe ANYTHING he says?
2007-05-23 04:08:33 · answer #6 · answered by big bend seminole 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋