I watched a documentary this morning. I find it amazing that he was found not guilty, he was practically caught red handed and yet he still managed to get away with it.
What do you think?
Is it another example of how you can do whatever you like, as long as you have a lot of cash?
2007-05-15 01:18:19 · 26 answers · asked by Zombie Jesus 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
I think he did, but the media pressure was so intense. I think this is the reason he got off with it.
2007-05-15 01:22:05 · answer #1 · answered by richard_beckham2001 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He spent millions on the defense and had some of the top of the line lawyers working on his case. Robert Shapiro, F. L Bailey, Johnnie Cochran, Barry Scheck and others. I mean if you got a team of like that all working together then you really cannot lose.I think the same could be said of Cullen Davis when he was accused of kiling 2 individuals at his mansion and Racehorse Hayes the attorney got him off. Then the next year Cullen Davis tried to set up and kill another man and Racehorse Hayes came in and got him off a second time. So if you have money, ;you can buy your way out.
2007-05-15 08:42:52 · answer #2 · answered by e j 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I will always believe that he did. I watched every day of that trial- which I thought was a mockery of the justice system.
Also, think about this... Why in the world would he write a bood "If I Did It"? I mean, that is just ridiculous. It's a shame that dogs can't talk because I think the dog (the Akita) saw everything.
He got away with murder plain & simple. He left those 2 children without a mother & Ron's parents without a son & future grandchildren. It was done violently & without remorse. I believe that while judgement may not come here on Earth for him that he will get what is coming to him.
2007-05-15 08:26:15 · answer #3 · answered by Gypsydayne 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If he didn't then that means there is a double homicide killer still on the loose that nobody knows about. I believe he did it and he's even flirting with the media by telling them he did it without actually saying he did it. All in all, he got off because of paid a high price for some awesome lawyering, only the rich get off like O.J. did.
2007-05-15 08:28:53 · answer #4 · answered by Sedit 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Now in the USA if you "Do an OJ" it ,means that you kill
your wife and get away with it. His trial was a disgrace and had he been a poor black guy who killed someone he would be toast now.You are right cash rules the USA that is why I fear that the UK in subservient fashion will extradite Gary Mc Kinnon to the USA, he is poor and therefore has little chance
See the link below
2007-05-15 09:06:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think he will answer to God. But as far as the verdict. It was like this. He had extremely good lawyers and he has a knack for attracting women and the majority of jurors were women. Plus the gloves didn't fit. Furthermore he had women paying him visits to his jail cell while he was incarcerated before and during the trial. Some were new to him. Imagine that. Just my opinion but if it was you or me we would have been on a gurney with a needle in our arm.
2007-05-15 08:36:50 · answer #6 · answered by thomas m 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course he did it. This is just another example of how a jury can be manipulated by a lawyer. Look at all his lawyers faces when the verdict was read. Even those close to him were surprised. God has spoken and his lawyer that was so happy to get him off,has paid the price.
2007-05-15 08:28:09 · answer #7 · answered by jackie 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes!! It's all about the money
If you have the money you can get away with just about anything
Paris hilton Drunk diriving
Brandy (moesha) Killed a person in a car accident
Kobe brynt Charged with rape
Robert blake Charged with murder
Micheal Jackson Charged with sexual battery
A shame but the rich get off
2007-05-15 08:34:26 · answer #8 · answered by stylishclaudia 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think he did it and I'm glad he did.
She was a stupid wh0re only after his money.
She wasn't worth putting O.J. in jail.
And putting O.J. in jail wasn't worth tax payers money or the riots that would have happen had he been found guilty.
So in the whole scheme of things I think they made the correct verdict but not the right one.
2007-05-15 08:32:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes he did it. Why else would he come out with a book titled "If I did it, heres how it happened." It describes how he would have killed his wife. The Jury probably figured since he was a football player that they will let him go so they found him not guilty. To bad now, he cant be charged with it again, The law prevents that from happening.
2007-05-15 08:27:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I was living in L.A. at the time. I couldn't believe it when he was found not guilty. It still sickens me. I take some solace in knowing that his life was still virtually ruined- nobody will touch him with a ten foot pole...
2007-05-15 08:24:08 · answer #11 · answered by Not so looney afterall 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋