I bought myself a 10 inch telescope. Neptune still resembles a tiny bluish starlike disc?

Question

I am wavering whether or not to buy a 11 inch Schmidt-Cassegrain telescope or even a 14 inch one- to see remote planets like Uranus and Neptune, let alone the galaxies. Can you tell me what Neptune looks like through a 14 inch telescope? Could I sneak a peek at its sattelites? Sorry for my english -I am from Romania

I am talking about seeing Neptune at about 500 x which is the maximum magnification of a 10 inch scope-whilst a 14 inch telescope has a peak value of about 850 x

Answer 1

Neptune is going to look like a tiny bluish disk with any telescope on the surface of the Earth. I observed it a couple of years ago with a 74" aperture telescope at the David Dunlap Observatory, and all I saw was a tiny bluish disk. The Earth's atmosphere limits the magnification you can use on any telescope to about 300x, except in very special circumstances.

Galaxies, on the other hand are quite easy to see. A few can be seen with the naked eye. I've seen hundreds of them with my 10" and 11" scopes. All that's need is dark skies and a trained eye.

Answer 2

In a 14 inch telescope, Neptune will look like a tiny bluish starlike disc. Once you get out past Saturn, you will not see any planetary detail with amateur sized scopes.

Answer 3

My club has one among those scope. that is totally incredible. yet i like my $800 Newtonian Dob greater useful. it is as a results of the fact i'm not in general involved in astrophotography. My Newtonian would not music the sky, yet suits in my vehicle, substitute into greater budget friendly, and contraptions up in decrease than 3 minutes. there is a minimum of one quasar that a 10" can see, and final summer season, i observed Pluto (approximately 14th magnitude). you will not see black holes - the main important scopes in the international do not see those. An oxygen 3 clear out assist you to work out nebula even in downtown Detroit, in a food market parking zone with the flood lights furnishings on (that could be a elementary description of my driveway). you could easily see m57 (the hoop), or m16 (the eagle). the horse head nebula is particularly faint, very small, and from an particularly darkish sky, and with avoided ingenious and prescient, that is particularly seen in a 22" telescope. The $800 i spent on my 10" will purchase 26 years of club in my astronomy club. that's what owns the 22" scope. And that could be a solid ingredient. It takes countless people to shelter one among those beast. the three P's of paying for for a telescope are value, overall performance, and Portability. value and Portability are practice stoppers. If it expenses too plenty, you won't be in a position to purchase it (except you wait). If that is not transportable, it continues to be the place it finally ends up, and frequently which capacity you do not use it. so as that leaves overall performance. overall performance is approximately capacity. greater mild (the diameter of the scope) is "the greater the greater useful". monitoring is a capacity, even without pictures. solid assessment is a capacity. a working laptop or computer merchandise finder is a capacity (which i elect to advise). My scope has a brilliant metallic tube. To get a scope that suits in my vehicle it is larger, the subsequent step is a truss Dob. Orion now sells a 12" truss dob. The down area is that it will take longer to establish. If i seem up, and that is clean, i understand that is 3 minutes earlier i might nicely be conscious. If i don't experience like it, i understand that is time for mattress.

Answer 4

Neither Uranus nor Neptune will show any significant detail in an amateur telescope, even a large one. They are too far away, and their features are very subtle. With a 14" scope, Neptune's largest moon, Triton, might be visible under perfect conditions if you have very sharp eyesight.

Answer 5

No telescope can reach it's maximum magnification ability on Earth due to the atmosphere.

Anyway, I suggest you ask this question in the forums at http://www.astromart.com

As for buying a larger telescope, can you ever have too large of a telescope?

Answer 6

the problem you are having has to do with the angular size of the objects you are observing. you will need a really big scope in order to see anymore detail than your observing now with your 10 inch scope. to see the kind of detail you see on saturn and jupiter you would need a 6 foot telescope in order to see that sort of detail on uranus and neptune. hubble can barely get that kind of detail. we used space craft to get those wonderful pictures you see of those planets. however, if you did buy a bigger scope you would be able to see a few more galaxies and more detail on the nebulas and galaxies you already observe. i hope this helps!!!!!!!

Answer 7

Neptune isn't going to look much different in a 14", but it's visible in binoculars and Triton should just be visible in a 6" (in theory!!), but I only know one person who's done it. You can see a few galaxies with the naked eye - a 10" will show many more - how many will depend on your skies and your eyesight. I'd stay with the10" for now until you've developed your observing skills - it takes practice!

Answer 8

Buy smaller aperture eye piece lenses. The larger the No.beyond the decimal the longer the focal length the clearer the image.