English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

civil law?
common law?
religius law?
costomery law?

2007-05-14 21:15:16 · 4 answers · asked by Jafar 1 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

4 answers

Common law and civil law have done the job well in their countries. In some cases common law appears to be better especially economically. But civil law has got its advantages as well. Common law or law that is digested from judicial decisions need good courts and judges to work. Where civil law only needs a good legislator. But then again even good laws need interpretation. Civil law even allows more interpretation then common law but common law just doesn't use as much legislation in the first place.

Conclusion: my guess is common law is maybe a bit better in well developed countries with high standards of education and wel trained judges etc.
Civil law could be the better choice for countries who aren't quite on their feet yet. But as lots of top ranking countries in the world (Europe) also use civil law, it's not correct to look at is as inferior to common law.

2007-05-15 03:18:35 · answer #1 · answered by Rooooooooo 2 · 0 0

When dealing with people it is legislated law and common law!

Civil law is part of that system.

Religious law is undefinable as most don't have a clue what they are talking about, misquote religious law, and it is meant for those who follow that faith. You have any idea how many different faiths, and knock-offs we have running around in this country?

2007-05-14 21:22:33 · answer #2 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0 0

Common law.
Properly applied.

2007-05-14 21:20:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

common law the bad part is that 90% of the people out there have no common sense

2007-05-14 21:22:43 · answer #4 · answered by Steven C 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers