Which criminal acts would you legalize? What would be the likely consequence of your actions?
2007-05-14 14:57:40 · 5 answers · asked by wawajuicybabygirl 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
I can't think of any laws I would change right away. I would make sure that the current laws were more strictly enforced. Why create new laws, when most are already on the books and ignored?
However, I would make the appeal process shorter for those people on death row. They should not be able to sit there for 20+ years milking the system. If you are found guilty in District, State Supreme and US supreme court, you are done. Three times is it!
2007-05-14 21:09:05 · answer #1 · answered by Jill R 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If I couldn't legalize cannabis, I would make expensive wine and whiskey illegal...not the regular stuff, gut rot would still be legal for us normal folks. Cigars and pipes would be illegal but I would keep cigarettes legal... Anyone in possession of any of these substances would face the same punishment as an equal amount of crack cocaine.
The death penalty would be made illegal. Wait...murder already is illegal...
Police shooting people (i.e. Amadou Diallo) more than 40 times would be put in jail for murder. Any police officer who didn't obey the law would face the same jail time and/or fine that any citizen faces. This would include traffic violations and repeatedly shooting an innocent man because he's black or white or whatever.
2007-05-14 15:07:54 · answer #2 · answered by Aquaman83 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wouldnt create any new laws and i'd pout to an open vote all laws that are currently on the books.
The consequence? We might actually have a government of the people, by the people, and for the people...
instead of one by the people who can raise the most money to get elected...
2007-05-14 15:02:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Johnnie Sutton that crooked sob has lied and sturdy courtroom information, to get what he needs. He totally helps illegals and our government isn't help those men out who did not something incorrect yet stop a armed drug runner. Bush helps Johnnie Sutton which ought to permit you already know the place bush stand in this annoying subject. Our government would not have the balls to stand up to the Mexico's stress it is in charge for lots of medicine that are extra around the border. Our government is greater apprehensive approximately their political face then they're help their border patrol brokers and get their back while low lifestyles scum site visitors drugs and individuals in the time of our borders. all of the evidence that Johnnie Sutton confirmed in courtroom substitute into sturdy and alter into not the legal information, the drug broker substitute into not shot in the back yet on his as$ jointly as he became to pointed a gun at border patrol brokers, this same drug broker has been caught many circumstances and every time has had a weapon on him and for them to assert he did not have in this time is BS and something isn't precise. people ought to get their info in the present day.
2016-11-23 13:00:55 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd do a lot more decriminalizing than criminalizing. The tax code would be a 4-page pamphlet, for instance.
Consequences would be near-anarchy.
2007-05-14 15:06:16 · answer #5 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋