2007-05-14 14:25:02 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
America won't be in any more danger than it is now. There's nothing to stop terrorists there from coming over here and attacking us now. It's not like they can't leave Iraq.
2007-05-14 14:37:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Middle East
2007-05-14 21:32:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Other countries in the Middle East first then us.
2007-05-14 21:43:53 · answer #3 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Iraq will crumble into a civil war and turn into an official terrorist country, much like Afghanistan a couple years ago, only a lot crazier.
In a decade or so, when the terrorist-run Iraq gets nuclear weapons from Iran, they will destroy Israel and kill millions of Americans. Therefore, both the Middle-east and America will suffer if Democrats get their way.
2007-05-14 21:31:29 · answer #4 · answered by lions_mc 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Neither. The US can put power all over the middle east whenever and whereever it wants to, *if the need arises.* There isn't a nation there that can do a thing about it.
Getting out of Iraq isn't about making intervention unthinkable.
It's about aborting a stupidly conceived, stupidly executed blunder before it unnecessarily costs more money and lives.
2007-05-14 21:37:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The other countries in the middle east until they realize they could pull together and attack America. Then we will be in more danger.
2007-05-14 21:29:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Initially, the moderate Arab country's and Israel would be the most vulnerable. Chances are, the whole damn thing would escalate, and I believe Israel would immediately take out the nuclear facilities in Iran.
Eventually the US would need to re-enter this war if this were to happen. For now, we are better off staying put. Look at all the transportation costs we will save by not having to make the return trip .
2007-05-14 21:41:29 · answer #7 · answered by briang731/ bvincent 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I believe it would put Iraqis first and formost in the most danger, then Israel, then europe, then the US.
Many nations would be happy to see us fail so they could send troops and ensure a bloodbath.
2007-05-14 21:52:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
in my humble opinion, america AND all the other countries of the middle east.
2007-05-14 21:31:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Tough call. I think the non-Shiite Iraqis left behind would be in the most extreme danger, followed by the US and anyone else Iran decides they don't like...
2007-05-14 21:39:01 · answer #10 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋