FOX NEWS EXCLUSIVE
The statement tells American voters that Abu Hafs al-Masri supports the re-election campaign of President Bush: "We are very keen that Bush does not lose the upcoming elections." The statement said Abu Hafs al-Masri needs what it called Bush's "idiocy and religious fanaticism" because they would "wake up" the Islamic world.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,114489,00.html
2007-05-14
13:27:04
·
17 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
MORE TERRORISTS FOR BUSH
Al Quaeda group officially backs Bush
"The statement said it supported U.S. President George W. Bush in his reelection campaign, and would prefer him to win in November rather than the Democratic candidate John Kerry, as it was not possible to find a leader "more foolish than you (Bush), who deals with matters by force rather than with wisdom."
In comments addressed to Bush, the group said:
"Kerry will kill our nation while it sleeps because he and the Democrats have the cunning to embellish blasphemy and present it to the Arab and Muslim nation as civilisation."
"Because of this we desire you (Bush) to be elected."
http://in.news.yahoo.com/040317/137/2c226.html
2007-05-14
13:27:12 ·
update #1
SECULARS FOR KERRY, FUNDIES FOR BUSH
The most pro-Kerry, he said, are the former Saddam Hussein loyalists — Ba'ath Party members and others who think Washington might scale back its ambitions for Iraq if Mr. Kerry wins, allowing them to re-enter civic life.
The most pro-Bush, he said, are the foreign extremists. "They prefer Bush, because he's a provocative figure, and the more they can push people to the extreme, the better for their case."
http://www.washtimes.com/world/20041027-121030-7792r.htm
2007-05-14
13:27:25 ·
update #2
Everything about Bush being president in bothersome.
2007-05-14 13:30:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by SN 4
·
3⤊
7⤋
The CIA is Al-Qaeda. The 70,000 company mercenaries (tax funds cost+ contracts) are those blowing up our women and adult males persons interior the protection stress. The NeoCon schedule is to maintain those unlawful 10-year bogust oil contracts we made with our puppet regime in stress, and rip off that oil as long as Exxon-Mobil and BP can. I easily have seen the US arm and fund the two factors of a conflict (i.e. Iran-Contra, arming the enemy of our significant different Iraq ), yet I knew if I lived long adequate, i might easily see US tax funds pay for our own enemies and the morons of my u . s . wave flags approximately it. Why do choose mercenaries at $six hundred+ in line with day for escorts, whilst former Iraqi military will do the comparable interest for $50 an afternoon and decrease the Iraqi unemployment cost from its cutting-edge 60%? Why are Halliburton American workers interior the oil fields and refineries instead of Iraqis? My fellow voters are so gullible the US government would desire to pass out "dunce caps" with their tax varieties. All our leaders are traitors, wake the hell up.
2017-01-09 21:06:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The American people have put their feet on the right path by ... realizing their president's betrayal in supporting Israel," the terror leader said. "So they voted for something reasonable in the last elections."
That is a direct quote from al Masri on 11/12/2006 - congratulating the Democrats on winning the elections.
So, Al-Qaeda supports the Democrats.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/11/10/iraq/main2170851.shtml
2007-05-14 13:46:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
That's the kind of mocking 'bring it on' posturing that isn't support at all. Just talking tough.
It's like how some virulent islamophobes are praying for another 9/11 so they can have further justification of thier hatred.
Or the way Democrats have to restrain themselves from smiling when things go badly in Iraq, because they know it'll hurt thier political rivals.
Nasty, ugly stuff, but hardly surprising.
2007-05-14 13:32:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by B.Kevorkian 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Oh, blah.
"The first casualty when war comes is the truth." -- Senator Hiram W. Johnson
In 2004, the "terrorists wanted Kerry," according to those rabid fundie "Christians" who endorsed our Idiot King.
Now, it's that they *really* wanted our Idiot King. Hogwash.
What any "terrorist" doesn't want is a nation that thinks for itself, with an educated public who decide their nation's fate -- not the fate of other nations.
2007-05-14 13:35:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
interesting.....
That part about "waking up the Islamic World" and bringin more people to the extreme make me sick
And that's from a modern, moderate, north american born Muslim that supports the war in iraq and anything else to kill extremists that give my faith a bad name.....
2007-05-14 13:31:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by Go Leafs Go 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Travolta stinks!
2007-05-14 13:35:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Our enemies love a weak-minded coward like Bush as U.S. Commander in Chief. They have never felt so safe and fat and happy as now. ---This is true whether they are American Neocons or Taliban Clowns.
2007-05-14 13:31:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by Mr. Vincent Van Jessup 6
·
2⤊
3⤋
There were extremeist groups who were behind Kerry too.
It is called propaganda. Look into it.
The US uses it too.
2007-05-14 13:31:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by David B 4
·
1⤊
3⤋
Well, Takes one to endorse one!!
2007-05-14 13:33:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by LIAR-KILLER 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
not as much as the baby murdering abortionist support all liberals. Libs murdered more than all terrorists
2007-05-14 13:30:29
·
answer #11
·
answered by porcerelllisman q 4
·
4⤊
4⤋