Yes. Personally with his past i don't even know why he is being allowed to run.
He is the last person we need in the Whitehouse
2007-05-14 12:28:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Vigilantis 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
i think of it would be significant so you might look on the excuses for the pro-abortion stance. I understand that any life is a solid life, yet in addition understand that, in honestly severe circumstances, it could have a greater constructive effect (study). i comprehend that it is tricky to understand. it would be undesirable if a coverage including abortion (one that's not concluded...including gun administration) have been the determining element for a presidential election. the two Obama/Biden have with regard to an identical perspectives in this difficulty. So my answer may be with a bit of luck not. i'm hoping the yank inhabitants is clever sufficient to be greater centred on rules which could have an effect...including our financial equipment. we'd desire to choose the proper applicants for a lot of those perspectives.
2016-12-11 09:26:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think that will hurt him as much as his other image problems. Republicans will be need to bridge the gap between the parties in order to get elected. At least you know where he stands on that issue even if you don't agree with it. I am more concerned about how he treated his first wife and the fact that he is on the payroll of a major pharmaceutical company, but won't say what he does for them. The way people handle their personal life tells you a lot more about their character than their well written speeches.
2007-05-18 10:47:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Jennifer B 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not only that, but include:
-several cross dressing episodes and living with homosexuals
-bringing his mistress to the mayoral mansion while his wife was there
-ties with the mob thru Bernard Kerik
-pro-gun control stance
Guiliani is toast.
McCain is too old and probably will be done in because he was so anti-Bush to Bushies and pandering to Jerry Falwell after calling him an ****** so many years ago.
The anti-evolution trio really don't stand a chance anymore. Maybe 20 years ago......
2007-05-14 12:00:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
It depends on whether the party actually wants an electable candidate or not. Guiliani might be electable, since he has some crossover apeal (OTOH, he might not be if he sufficiently alienates the base - it's not that hardcore conservatives would vote democrat, instead, but they might be so discouraged as not to vote at all).
Evolution is not nearly the hot button issue that abortion is, so MCain deigning to show a little sanity on the subject shouldn't hurt him much.
2007-05-14 11:51:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by B.Kevorkian 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I expect this issue to hurt Rudy in the primaries. It remains to be seen if this a is a fatal weakness. McCain is floundering & Romney has some questions to answer about his positions on social issues. The 3 you mentioned haven't reached double digits COMBINED in any poll I've seen.
2007-05-14 12:34:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, because he's the hero of 9/11.
2007-05-14 14:08:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
yes, republicans despise this discusting practice
2007-05-14 11:45:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by porcerelllisman q 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
No because Republicans are deperate.
2007-05-14 11:41:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by Vultureman 6
·
0⤊
3⤋
Please God, and please God, McNasty (as he was called in school) and brownback will lose too.
2007-05-14 11:43:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6
·
2⤊
0⤋