Are they so afraid of talk radio they are willing to attack the first amendment. and who on this board will say you have gone too far to bring comunisim to the USA. Does this make any one angry?
2007-05-14
11:34:54
·
25 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
air america failed they lost now they want to legislate their failure.
2007-05-14
11:40:22 ·
update #1
senior advisor to pelosi" conservative radio is a huge threat we have to find ways to limit it." does that scare you?
2007-05-14
11:51:50 ·
update #2
Liberal Democrats want the US government to control everything and they want to control the government. Most talk show hosts on radio are conservatives. The last election in 2006 shows that these hosts do not influence voters. Otherwise, the Democrats would not have won a majority of seats. Liberals fear and hate what they cannot control. There is so much advertising money being generated by conservative talk shows that liberals will never be able to shut up the hosts with anything like the so-called "fairness doctrine."
2007-05-14 11:41:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by regerugged 7
·
3⤊
4⤋
When you can't compete in the field of radio communications you have to over-regulate. That is essentially what is going on here.
To answer a previous answerer: One of these talk show hosts calling someone a traitor because they voice opposition to the war is NOT a violation of that person's right to free speech. The first amendment only states that the government shall make no law abridging the right to free speech. If the government arrested people for voicing opposition to government policy, that would be a violation of free speech. If an individual says something, other individuals have the right to personally attack that person, this is usually done when they have nothing to back up their point of view.
2007-05-14 11:44:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by msi_cord 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I guess living in NY I live in a bubble of sanity. Or at least what I consider sanity and what you would call attacking that US from all ends. I have never heard of half the crazy things I read on here, it makes my head turn 360 degress to realize what goes on around the rest of the country. Since when has there ever been anything about a democrat wanting to ban freedom of speech. if there is any party that honors the constitution and the Bill or Rights to the letter of how it was written it is the democratic party, not the Republican party, who tries to find clauses to get around everything. Yes, talk radio is offensive to a lot of us, but as we are smarter than the average chimp, we have learned one thing, there is an off button on the radio and we don't have to listen to what we don't want to listen to. So, please continue to have your shows and continue to entertain yourselves, we aren't listening.
2007-05-14 18:31:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by lochmessy 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Norman Finklestein is banned from israel in all threat only by using actuality he speaks brazenly and particularly approximately israeli's strikes and freedom of speech isn't portion of israel's value because it truly is indoors the U. S.. The israeli government denies (what a ask your self) what Norman Finklestein says, that are records. It in all threat annoys them better only by using hassle-free actuality that he's a jew. I spoke of him communicate a pair of weeks interior the previous at Harvard college and he's a appropriate spoken and impartial guy. you will prefer to tell who the zionists have been indoors the purpose objective industry only by using actuality a lot of them saved making faces and regarded aggravated, looking away or down and a few even left during his lecture it truly is impolite. They knew the region he stands indoors the conflict so i do now no longer understand why they went. additionally Norman Finklestein would not deny the Holocaust. His very own father and mom have been victims of the Holocaust.
2016-12-17 12:38:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by chaplean 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Anger never solves the problem, activism does!
Get out the word that We the People want to know why the dems think they OWN the government and deny the people?
They forget that they govern through the good graces of the voters. We voters threw them out of power in the 90's and the '08 election is going to be even more dramatic!
LEAVE THE BILL OF RIGHTS ALONE!!!
Odd that if the Republicans were doing what the Democrats are doing it would be labled a right-wing conspiracy. Do the Dems think they are really capable of making Marxism work in America just because they have grand delusions of superior intellect?
Borrowing words of Captain Kirk in Star Trek II The Wrath of Kahn: "Kahn, I'm laughing at the superior intellect."
2007-05-14 11:45:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jimbobby2753 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
Since conservative talk show radio is so successful and all their attempts at liberal talk shows go in the crappers, it appears as if they are trying t piggy back on success. I have a serious problem with government manipulation of the first amendment rights or with the media in anyway. This is indeed a pathway to controlling the media. Putin must be smiling quite broadly right now and my contempt for those working pushing this initiative has grown even more.
2007-05-14 11:43:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
I am a democrat and I have NEVER and will never try to ban you from speaking your mind. Even if I think you are a stark raving lunatic. To make a statement as general as yours shows you know NOTHING of what you say.
I go along with Patrick Henry who during a meeting of the Virgina House of Burgesses said "Although I disagree with what you say I will defend to the death your right to say it".
No go back and listen to that clap trap on conservative hate radio.
2007-05-14 11:43:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
no, what scares me is seeing that many of the people on here are so close minded and un-informed...I'm really hoping this web site is not an accurate representation of the American people...if it is, we are all in big BIG trouble..
I've never seen any Dem on here or anywhere else say that they wanted to ban freedom of speech...I've seen more Repubs and cons saying that than i have Dems and libs..
2007-05-14 12:04:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by Paulien 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
it has nothing to do with free speech. It has more to do with monitoring monopolies as the government has always done.
by the way in 1969, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Fairness Doctrine, under challenges that it violated the First Amendment.
2007-05-14 11:41:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by truth seeker 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
Because Democrats are afraid of the truth. The truth would certainly lose them their pathetic "anti-Bush majority" They still like to believe that people actually voted for them!. These people in control of their party are Dangerous, do not be mislead. If we do not soon wake up and squash them we shall be in the same pathetic state as Europe.
Who, in their right mind, would allow people like Soros to buy his way in to the Party and have controlling influences?.
2007-05-14 11:47:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by ib_enigma 2
·
2⤊
2⤋