And is there a ratio in performance for memory clock vs core clock?
2007-05-14
10:05:29
·
4 answers
·
asked by
scooter
4
in
Computers & Internet
➔ Hardware
➔ Add-ons
Your all retarded, I know how to overclock, the risks, and how minimal the performance gain is in this example. You don't need aftermarket cooling, the core clock is more important than the memory clock, and it is an amazing way to build a high end system for less. On a $100 board and stock cooling I easily overclocked an e4300 up to ~3 Ghz stable. So instead of performing like an e4300 ($115), it performs like an x6800 ($945). And apparently you know nothing about video cards, or you would know how huge of a performance gain you can get from a simply 100 MHz overclock on the core and 200-300 MHz on the memory. I just wanted to figure out if there was a ratio between core and memory overclocking in terms of performance gains. So thanks for nothing, chumps.
2007-05-15
14:37:38 ·
update #1