http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/thomas
2007-05-14 09:12:51 · 15 answers · asked by hazard to your heath 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
it's only been 4 months, you need to give them time to get through that first 100 hours... oh... wait... umm...
2007-05-14 09:18:12 · answer #1 · answered by trc_6111 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
in view that others have stated the grammar, I won't say something approximately that. whilst i did not study all your positioned up, i'm going to assert which you have some misconceptions approximately quite a few issues. First, if any of those issues have been quite unconstitutional, they could be challenged in courtroom and the stunning courtroom ought to declare them unconstitutional. although, a lot of your examples have the two on no account been challenged or they have been challenged and the courts desperate they have been constitutional. 2d, there's a particular clause stated as the "universal welfare" clause. there is a few debate as to what this clause fairly means, yet, for the previous 2 hundred years, it is been interpreted to intend that the government can levy taxes and pass rules for the universal welfare regardless of the different enumerated powers. 0.33, the Federal Reserve became into not created by applying an government order. It became into, in actuality, created by applying an act of Congress. It surpassed the homestead by applying a vote of 298 to 60 and it surpassed the Senate by applying a vote of 40 3 to 20-5. opposite to what some conspiracy theorists believe, the bill became into not surpassed whilst Congress became into in recess. Congress stayed late that 12 months, purely like they did in 1995 and 1987. Fourth, you state it is the States sole duty to take care of itself. it is erroneous. Article a million section 8 of the form states, partly, "to enhance and help Armies, yet no Appropriation of money to that Use would be for an prolonged term than 2 Years; to grant and shelter a army;" the two years stated above basically refers to investment. Congress can not make a regulation pointing out the protection rigidity gets $4 hundred billion a 12 months for 10 years. although, they could make a regulation each and every 12 months that announces the protection rigidity gets $XXX billion in investment. States can and do shelter a protection rigidity (aka national shelter), yet a protection rigidity is lots different than a protection rigidity. 5th, it does not say everywhere interior the form that the States are to make their very own money. What it does is say is that the States can not make something yet "gold and silver coin a young interior the charge of money owed". it is a dilemma on State means and not asserting that State would desire to mint their very own money. additionally, nowhere interior the form does it state that paper money isn't allowed.
2016-11-03 22:08:47 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They're posturing for the 2008 elections. That's all they do. Pass meaningless legislation that looks good on the surface , but does nothing to solve any problems. That's why the bills are vetoed. If they spent as much time coming up with something truly meaningful as they do attacking the President for doing his job, maybe he would sign something.
2007-05-14 11:25:41 · answer #3 · answered by srdongato2 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The so called President and Congress are playing head games with the American People.. The only thing they look forward to is their paycheck and payday.. Its B.S. and they love it..
2007-05-14 10:02:05 · answer #4 · answered by dca2003311@yahoo.com 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Uh....No......Thought Hillary said My Gas would go down if the Dems. got Congress.
Guess she was talking about a different kind of Gas for Me.
That didn't work either, it's worse than ever listning to Pelosi...
2007-05-14 09:26:56 · answer #5 · answered by Ken C 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well when you have a president that threatens or vetoes everything they do, it's kind of hard to get anything done. And what pray tell did the congress before this one get done?
2007-05-14 09:19:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
voted on which of them was holding the next $1000 a plate speech luncheon.......our steadfast congress seems to be as effective standing up to Bush as using a t-ball bat to beat someone to death......
2007-05-14 09:20:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
The President has pretty much said he is going to veto anything they send him.
Anything that doesn't meet his personal agenda.
How's THAT for democracy? HUH?
2007-05-14 09:18:03 · answer #8 · answered by Bush Invented the Google 6 · 5⤊ 3⤋
Still busy renaming government buildings after themselves .
2007-05-14 09:16:39 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Pelosi got a bigger airplane.
2007-05-14 09:35:06 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋