I mean, he's a baby! He's not gonna know the difference.
2007-05-14 08:59:45 · 20 answers · asked by Oprah's Minge 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Helllll yeah! Then I'd give it to you,... as a present.
HAPPY MAY THE FOURTEENTH.
=]
2007-05-14 10:24:40 · answer #1 · answered by Lex 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, especially if the baby could choke on it. I'd give the little tyke a piece of fruit instead.
2007-05-14 19:50:45 · answer #2 · answered by gone 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, why make two messes when I can just clean up one when he's done. Plus not having to listen to a screaming baby has it's up side.
2007-05-14 16:02:52 · answer #3 · answered by Firespider 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Babies shouldn't eat candy so why does he/she have it in the first place?
2007-05-14 16:04:17 · answer #4 · answered by Beach Girl 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would take it because it's not safe for a baby to have candy. It's a choking hazard! :)
2007-05-14 16:03:52 · answer #5 · answered by Kate S 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Babies aren't really supposed to have candy anyway.
2007-05-14 16:02:39 · answer #6 · answered by tillbaka i tiden 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Only if I knew the baby...
2007-05-14 16:12:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I have taken my 2year olds halloween candy...does that count??
2007-05-15 09:46:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I do all the time.
People shouldn't give my kids candy without asking me first.
2007-05-14 16:02:27 · answer #9 · answered by Formerly known as Jen F. 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
That's funny but I would never do it because that's mean.
2007-05-14 16:03:11 · answer #10 · answered by Mami 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋