Why does every Bush question get a response regading Clinton?

Question

guess what Sean Hannity watchers, Bill Clinton isn't president, saying Clinton did something is not a justification...It actually proves the posters point about Bush when you're only defense of him is...Clinton did this...Some of us Bush bashers never like Clinton much either to be honest but at least attempt to defend your man and not bring non related garbage. Agre or No?

Answer 1

Agree. It is the sign of true immaturity when you can't accept the fact that you or your side could have made a mistake and instead have to go point blame on your predecessor. . . there is no way it can ALWAYS be someone else's fault.

Answer 2

You really expect people to argue fairly? Some people don't know that "Clinton did worse" is no excuse for Bush, while others know that and still say it anyway. This is the internet, not a debate tournament.

I do know what you are saying though--I threw away my vote on a third party in Clinton's first term, voted against Dole (which, I guess, means I voted for Clinton) in his second term, but I was never thrilled with the guy either. But Bush sucks! Until we get rid of the electoral college, we will always have to make the choice between evil and stupid. My vote is for stupid.

Answer 3

i do no longer equate Bush with Hitler as human beings. experience greater effective? yet Bush has achieved various issues interior the final 6 years that are eerily like what Hitler did (questionable election effects, patriot act, putting forward conflict without international help) Nor do I declare no longer something Clinton did had a pertaining to Bush. yet what I shop listening to from the terrific suited Wing media is that each and every thing that Bush has failed at is Clinton's fault. that's a huge distinction.

Answer 4

In some cases, there is a precedent set that may apply. I do not know specifically to what you are referring, but I'll give an example.

Bush basher writes "Iraq never attacked the US."

Bush backer writes "Somalia never attacked the US, but you guys gave Clinton a pass on that one."

It is usually hypocritical on both sides.

Answer 5

Because the 27% of the lemming Republicans who support the Lame Duck President have been spoon fed just like Pavlov's dog as they are easily trained just like sheep and their sheep herder is the Lame Duck President George Walker Bush. Everytime one of these lemmings sees or hears about Bush they salivate at the mouth in response just like Pavlov's dog.

Answer 6

It demonstrates the limited abilities of the people responding to honest criticism of a disaster in progress.

Bush's failures are so overwhelming that the only means the right wing has left is to behave childishly and name call.

They cannot face reality. Things were far better before Bush and the voter fraud that put him in office. It will take decades to undue the damage he has brought down on our great nation.

Answer 7

The same way each democrat question is asked and is responded with a bush answer.

I'm guessing you're a noob to the forum.

Answer 8

Because Bush is still cleaning up the mess after 8 years of Clinton

Answer 9

We tried to ask those questions when he was in office and you couldn't answer them then, so it begs the quesiton now: Why do libs give Clinton a free pass for his failed, and humiliating administration, but are quick to blame Bush for every hold over problem he created?

Answer 10

I think this is a fallacious premise. Feel free to check out my answers and let me know.