English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What i find so unfair is that the ICC have chosen South Africa to host the first ever twenty20 world cup this autumn! The question im asking is why? This form of the game was invented in the UK yet we don't get to host it first, what the hell is going on there how stupid and wrong is this!

2007-05-14 02:38:52 · 14 answers · asked by stevieboy 3 in Sports Cricket

14 answers

You are right.
The reason is UK might be a super power in general. It is not a super power in cricket.

2007-05-16 01:33:51 · answer #1 · answered by rajarammohanroy 1 · 0 0

The decision to select South Africa to host the first Twenty/20 World Cup was taken by ICC Executive Committee after examining the bids made by the nations keen to hold the event.

It has been decided to hold the event in 2007 at South Africa, in 2009 at England, in 2012 at Sri Lanka and in 2014 atBangladesh.

The ICC decided that South Africa and England should host the first two tournaments because they were the earliest adopters of the format.

2007-05-14 11:39:06 · answer #2 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 2 0

God bless us, because a 50 over game was too much for us!
It should have been hosted in Uk, since it last hosted a WC in 1999, and maybe next in 2019, as India hosts 2011 and Aussies 2015.

2007-05-15 02:19:44 · answer #3 · answered by Oye chak de phatte!! 5 · 1 0

If ICC is looking for money then the tournament would surely come to the sub-continent which generates more money for cricket than any other continent. The selection of venue is based on bid. May be england might have lost the bid. ICC should not be blamed for this

2007-05-14 15:59:06 · answer #4 · answered by Dinesh 1 · 2 0

Your right ! as undisputed World Champions Australia should be honoured by hosting the World Twenty20 Cup. We do it better than anyone else !

2007-05-14 09:54:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

all the icc care about is money u would get more people in south africa than in england thats why. i didnt really think people cared about 20/20 anyway

2007-05-14 15:00:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

http://cricket123.proboards104.com/index.cgi?

You may talk about this and many other things.You can discuss about any team, and players, their performance in Test Matches, ODIs, and 20-20 cricket.You can even discuss about Minnow Cricket Nations or talk about Cricket Issues.100s of members will be there to answer your queries like these.It is Kid Friendly(No foul language) and it is free!

http://cricket123.proboards104.com/index.cgi?

2007-05-15 06:16:42 · answer #7 · answered by Cricket Champion 1 · 0 0

Dear,

the response from Mr.VAKAYIL is absolutely correct, other posts are not in the real spirit of cricket.

2007-05-14 14:21:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

yes politics ,curruption, and Bribery..
thats what white dominated countries do for Cricket.
world cup for an Example
Umpires & ICC supported OZ
Yes its,Disgusting...man

2007-05-14 14:08:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

south africa has better batting pitches than england.

2007-05-14 18:27:24 · answer #10 · answered by cricket4lyfe921 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers