2007-05-13 17:33:36 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Chances are nowdays the US itself
2007-05-13 17:53:15 · answer #1 · answered by The real Ed-Mike 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
to be concerned isn't so stupid yet a Witch Hunt mentality is something to stay away from and using books in this difficulty to remind people of the hazards of this attitude might desire to be usefull. Pamphletts and books in police stations and during Public places might desire to be of use to stay away from this type of mentality. The reaction may be the two yet another war or a promise to get the folk at the back of it. There might desire to be something else that would happen it truly is that if a President became in favour of possession of the planet by using voters and so have been different persons then the supplies of the excellent planet may be placed to apply to be sure who did it.
2016-12-17 12:00:38 · answer #2 · answered by vasim 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The only countries with declared or determined capabilities to strike the U.S. with an ICBM are NATO members and Russia.
The better question is what terrorist network would be likeliest to obtain materials for a dirty bomb, and sophisticated enough to smuggle it through the border.
We can worry about missiles again in about another decade, when countries like China have delivery systems reliable enough to pose a serious threat.
2007-05-13 18:07:47 · answer #3 · answered by buzzfeedbrenny 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If it is a nuclear missile strike, it will be from Iran. They are the only country suicidal enough to launch a missile at the US. They are still a decade away from being able to do that thank goodness.
So maybe we should start talking to them NOW? Just maybe?
2007-05-13 17:38:23 · answer #4 · answered by Glen G 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
only 3 countries in the world have the capability of reaching the US, and the 4th is a long shot.
UK, france and russia all have capability of reaching the US.
china claims it does, but that is only from a submerged launch from a submarine, and the chances of one of their submarines getting close enough to reach the continental US is slim to none.
building a nuke warhead is the easy part, delivering it is the hard part.
2007-05-13 17:45:51 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Some middle east country or China
2007-05-13 17:39:25 · answer #6 · answered by bbj1776 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bush/Cheney
2007-05-13 17:41:30 · answer #7 · answered by AZ123 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
a third world country or a tarriest who does not care if the world survives.
2007-05-13 17:38:31 · answer #8 · answered by FarmerCec 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
from either north korea, or iran those are your two best bets. they don't have em yet but they are working on that. if bush doesn't do something soon.
2007-05-13 22:48:31 · answer #9 · answered by green supporter 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Doesn't matter who fired it... the conspiracy theorists will say it was "an inside job," and the youtube scholars will have the youtube "facts" to prove it.
2007-05-13 17:53:17 · answer #10 · answered by scruffycat 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋