Me personally I am growing weary of all the "impeach Bush" garbage. It is NOT going to happen so please people, quit wasting our time with it.
2007-05-13 13:41:21 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I think I'm going to post at least 1 "impeach Bush" question a day now.....lol...jk
2007-05-14 03:00:53 · answer #1 · answered by notacomet 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You're not the only one! Wouldn't it be nice if once in a while liberals would focus on the facts, which are that Bush cannot be impeached unless he commits an impeachable offense? Not liking the guy is NOT an impeachable offense!
2007-05-13 20:44:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Lib Dims can't remove Bush if they tried to.
To find a president guilty, two thirds of the senate needs to agree. Only half of the senate is Democrat. :)
THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION
Clause 6: The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present"
2007-05-13 20:43:35 · answer #3 · answered by a bush family member 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Bush will never be impeached, here's why-
If you impeach a president for trying to protect the USA ( no matter how twisted you think the protection may be) it will make future president's choose between protecting the country or future political fall out .
2007-05-13 20:56:01 · answer #4 · answered by lennyspall@sbcglobal.net 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Don't be so sure. President Nixon was reelected in 1972 by a landslide (60% of the vote).
"In 1972, Nixon was re-elected in one of the biggest landslide election victories in U.S. political history, defeating Senator George McGovern and garnering over 60% of the popular vote. He carried 49 of the 50 states, losing only in Massachusetts and the District of Columbia."
He was a great man, and Spiro Agnew his vice president was an extraordinarily attractive man and a good speaker. No one would have wanted to bet against them. Who would have thought that within months they both would be out of office and in disgrace.
2007-05-13 20:55:17 · answer #5 · answered by johnfarber2000 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Impeachment proceedings would take to long and cost too much money. Bush would be out of office before anything was accomplished. A better idea would be to try Bush in an international tribunal for high crimes against humanity, and - if convicted - hang him just as he arranged to hang Saddam Hussein. -RKO- 05/13/07
2007-05-13 20:57:00 · answer #6 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Sure,why not? Just because your tired of hearing it doesn't mean millions of others want to stop pushing it! Although we are past the impeachment stage,because now we're into the impale the prick stage of things! Care to catch up with the rest of us?
2007-05-13 21:31:30 · answer #7 · answered by Jake 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Thought his father was behind hostages in Iran, and think he let happen or help happen 9/11 so kindly allow me my impeachment fantasy.
2007-05-13 22:13:47 · answer #8 · answered by Mister2-15-2 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
We don't know if Bush WON'T be impeached. Just be sure we get Cheney too.
2007-05-13 21:57:20 · answer #9 · answered by planksheer 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The point is to continue talking about it so that enough of a ruckus is made to actually influence congressmen to begin impeachment proceedings.
2007-05-13 21:52:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anon 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋