English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-05-13 13:22:47 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Since liberals think hes commited so many "crimes"

Can't they name 3 without making the 3 up?

2007-05-13 13:23:35 · update #1

29 answers

1 he whipped al gore
2 he whipped john (ho chi min) Kerry
3 he has pushed the american economy to unprecidented heights

2007-05-13 13:27:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 12 2

Extending govt privilege previous the scope of the present constitutional regulation is an impeachable offense. Willfully mendacity to the yank public many times approximately healthcare reform (somewhat achieveable the backside element conceivable) is an impeachable offense. determining directly to not enforce present immigration regulations for political benefit is an impeachable offense. in case you seem on the sum finished of all the different scandals that befell for the duration of his administration, it is incredibly elementary to return up with reasons to question, yet that ought to easily incite greater rioting. you spot, we live in an "ends justify the flexibility" society the place good and incorrect recommend little in comparison to political correctness. If President Obama replaced into white and his schedule diverse, there may be relentless tension from the media to question. however the mainstream media completely endorses the Obama schedule, so little if something unfavourable is pronounced related to this administration. somewhat, if Jonathan Gruber were working for the Republican occasion and a Republican President lied as blatantly to the yank human beings approximately some thing as deeply very own as healthcare, how long do you think of he may be in workplace?

2016-10-05 00:48:49 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

10. He stole one (maybe two) elections;
9. He lied to Congress and the American people about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq just so he could settle a personal vendetta his family had against Hussein;
8. He condoned the torture and abuse of 'detainees' (and don't claim he 'didn't know about it' - that's no excuse for a Commander-In-Chief);
7. His reckless economic policies will result in the worst economic depression this country has ever seen shortly after he leaves office;
6. He violated the rules of the Geneva Convention;
5. He's disregarded the U.S. Constitution, which he was sworn to uphold;
4. He covered up the fact that he had 'secret' CIA prisons all over the world;
3. His 'war' in Iraq has cost American taxpayers trillions of dollars, which will result in the U.S. losing its reputation as a trusted ally, a global peacekeeper and a world leader;
2. He has put American taxpayers TRILLIONS of dollars in debt, which will take generations to pay off (if we ever can pay it off);
1. And, oh yes....as Commander-In-Chief he has caused the deaths of 675,000 innocent Iraqi citizens for no justifiable reason, not to mention the deaths of 3,300 U.S. soldiers who were conned into believing they went to 'war' to bring democracy to Iraq, when - in fact - it was all about OIL and WAR PROFITEERING.

If that's not cause for impeachment, I don't know what is. If necessary, let's get some White House intern to give Bush a blo*job, since we KNOW that's ground for impeachment.

-RKO- 05/13/07

2007-05-13 13:46:56 · answer #3 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 3 2

I wanted to wait until the 'verdict' was in before responding. Since he 'lied' so much and everyone agreed with him, can we just go ahead and impeach ALL of those who agreed?

What a crock.

Keep this link and display their responses the next time they bring up impeachment!

2007-05-13 13:47:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Well I noticed you didn't get any answers from any liberals until you get way down to the end, you either stunned them, confused them, or made them look up the answers in their come back book. And the ones who probably had it written on the backs of their hands were pretty lame considering the Democrats bought the same information.

2007-05-13 13:42:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

The libs have found their hero. Thruthspeaker10 has got the goods on Bush. Get that evidence to Pelosi and Reid right away. All they really need is your proof and evidence and then its all a done deal.

We are eternally grateful to Truthspeaker.

2007-05-13 13:41:04 · answer #6 · answered by Ret. Sgt. 7 · 3 1

I did not stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night and I am not a liberal. I will attempt to be one under the circumstances.

1. He lied about WMDs in Iraq and that was why we went. Note we went in to enforce the 17 UN resolutions. Note Saddam gassed the Kurds.

2. He does not listen to liberals. Note he was elected and is Commander in Chief

3. He has done nothing to enforce immigration laws and has compromised the national security of the US. Wait, this is legit.

2007-05-13 13:29:49 · answer #7 · answered by Chainsaw 6 · 7 3

Sounds like you are in favor, of all the blood being shed by our brothers and sisters over in Iraq.
If declaring war on a counrty,for no reason other then to gain control of the oil, is not reason enough to get impeached.
Then it shows just what the rest of the world sees the US as, an "Axil of Evil.
Replublicans, are the reason, we are in the shape we are in now.
Bush is no different than Sadaam Hussan,he just kills thousands on different soil.

2007-05-13 13:48:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

1Not protecting our borders by allowing (encouraging)20,000,000 criminals,who have no respect for our laws,culture or communities to come here illegally and lower our quality of life . 2 Helping communist china build there military by letting them dump there crap here,poison our food supply and pets for profit and stealing our military technology.3 And finally for sending our troops to war with there hands tied behind their backs,not permitting them to fight a war properly by prohibiting them from shooting at a terrorist pig because he's hiding in a mosque, allowing that pansy al sadr and his gang to openly attack our troops and encourage others to do the same with out consequences, and much more !

2007-05-13 14:10:36 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

It doesn't really matter what I can come up with. Clinton was impeached for lying about having sex with an interm. Like that's a high crime.

For Bush, I'm sure there's at least one lie, or one coverup that can be found if you look hard enough.

And it looks like the republicans are leaving the sinking ship as fast as they can. No Senator will want to be painted with the "bush" brush ocme next election. No need to actually CONVICT Bush...but payback does happen.

2007-05-13 13:32:44 · answer #10 · answered by tallthatsme 4 · 3 5

Lied to congress when he stated that going to war would be the last resort. This is when he sought war powers from congress. The Downing street memo proves their intention to fit the facts to the effort to attack Iraq. The memo predates that request to congress. It was recently validated when two functionaries were sentenced in England for leaking secrets.

He manipulated data about weapons of mass distruction being in the hands of Iraq as a reason to go to war with a state that had no part in Sept. 11th.

3200 america dead and counting!

2007-05-13 13:36:20 · answer #11 · answered by V 1 · 3 4

fedest.com, questions and answers