English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-05-13 12:58:38 · 3 answers · asked by rahul s 1 in Business & Finance Other - Business & Finance

Like it is regarding the organizations and managers performance...quarterly or anually

2007-05-13 13:15:15 · update #1

3 answers

Good question. Need more detail on the specific issue to answer. But we are all accountable. do we drop toxins in the river, no. But if we do, we should be held accountable.
I want to reply but you need to be more specific in the question please.

2007-05-13 13:07:09 · answer #1 · answered by Michael M 7 · 0 0

In publically-held companies traded in a free market they already are. "Socially responsible behaviour" is a relative thing, and is judged by the buyers of a company's stock and it's products. McDonald's (the world's largest purchaser of beef) decided to buy beef only from farmers using "low-stress" slaughterhouses because they believed they would be judged negatively by stockholders & by customers if they did not do so.

2007-05-13 13:10:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Only insofar as how their industry impacts society. For instance, I don't believe they should be polluting, but as far as charitable causes and such, that's not their business. They shouldn't have to be wasting their time like that. Should social workers be evaluated with regard to how much they contributed to the business goals of corporations?

2007-05-13 13:05:00 · answer #3 · answered by Emily Dew 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers