The next one can be 96+54+17 = 167
---------------
Reason:
11, 42, 96, 167
31, 54, 71 (difference of two neighbor terms of 11, 42, 96, 167)
17, 17 (difference of two neighbor terms of 31, 54, 71 )
-----------
JP,
Thank you for pointing out the error. However, except that error all the concepts in my approach should be right.
2007-05-13 11:49:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by sahsjing 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
For the gentlemen who decided that the difference between 96 and 42 = 34. Is completely incorrect. 96-42= 54. This would give no logic to why you could concluded the differences is just the subtractive amount in increments of +3. I'm still trying to figure it out.
Update: I think I got it, the number could be 915. Because , 2-1= 1 (which is the first number in 11). 6-2=4 (which is the first number in 42. So the only thing that can make 9 is a last number of 15. (15-6=9). So I concluded that the last digit is "15". To get the 9, you just.. Damnit I lost it. It's a complex pattern. But it is there. Once I get how I got the 9, I will post it.
2007-05-13 19:02:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by JP 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
it's not really enough terms to establish a pattern, but if you can argue it consistently, then it can't be wrong. So I am going to go with this:
96 was 42 + (11+42+1), so
the term after 96 will be
96 + (42 + 96 + 1) = 235
defined recursively, this formula would be
a1 = 11, a2 = 42
a(n+1) = 2*a(n) + a(n-1) + 1
2007-05-13 19:13:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by Kathleen K 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
11, 42, 96
Not enough data
Adding is +31, +53, so the next could be +75, which gives 171
2007-05-13 19:21:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by Steve A 7
·
0⤊
0⤋