2007-05-13 07:48:33 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The ultra rich will always remain at home while the working man will always go to war. The ultra rich will always get the benefits of a conclusion to war, the working man will be lucky to get over the trauma.
One set of people are cowards, the others are courageous. A pity that the cowards gain the benefits of war.
2007-05-13 07:58:11 · answer #1 · answered by Mike T 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It is just as said. The story behind all the wars is nothing but greed and power to control. So poor man always fights the rich man's war.
2007-05-13 07:54:25 · answer #2 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The implication in that statement is that the rich decide to go to war, but leave the poor to actually fight.
2007-05-13 07:52:38 · answer #3 · answered by ItsJustMe 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
the infantrymen which have been in Nam have been from poorer families who could not deliver their young ones to college to get them a deferment, or whose father and mom weren't bigwigs interior the goverment to drag strings for them (like G. W. Bush). the staggering brass that directed the conflict have been from richer families and did not care with regard to the infantrymen who hadn't a clue approximately guerilla conflict. so as that they died via the thousand--who cares? there became into an excellent form of income in producing weapons, chemical components like Agent Orange, and "hardware" including tanks, helicopters, workers companies. That conflict made some hundred of the elite richer than ever, yet that did not help the infantrymen who died or have been pushed loopy via the conflict. it is my view of the Vietnam conflict, which I controlled to sidestep via coming to Canada. My judgment of right and incorrect would not enable me to take area. i'm constructive there are greater factors in contact than that, yet offhand i might say those I gave are exceedingly stable.
2016-12-11 08:21:41 · answer #4 · answered by okamura 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cheney's 5 war deferments and he is now rich
American's went to Vietnam and came back homeless
2007-05-13 08:22:05 · answer #5 · answered by Mr. USA U 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Sadly, US Liberals are the guiltiest at pretending to care about the poor, just to get reelected.
I'm sure that's not what you meant.
But it's true nonetheless. The wealthiest Americans are Liberals.
2007-05-13 08:23:31 · answer #6 · answered by Shrink 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
It's nothing but a political ploy. The first answerer is correct.
2007-05-13 07:55:19 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
My avatar's way cooler then yours,Momarella.
2007-05-13 07:56:44 · answer #8 · answered by Tin Foil Fez 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋