I know some reasons, best QBs, best RBs, best WRs, but thats just on the offensive side...
2007-05-13 04:18:40 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football (American)
True, the AFC does have the top 3 QBs in the league:
Tom Brady
Peyton Manning
Carson Palmer
2007-05-13 11:29:41 · update #1
That's because the AFC has way more talent then the NFC does.
2007-05-13 07:49:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Mostly the best QBs. The NFC will eventually catch up and pass the AFC again though, it is the way the NFL goes. The RBs are actually rather equal if you ask me, it is that the AFC has the better passing threat and makes the running threat that much stronger. Oh and the NFC has some good WRs, once again it is about have a good QB/WR combo.
2007-05-13 11:53:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
It's the quarterbacks. Look at all the solid starters in the AFC:
Tom Brady
Chad Pennington
Ben Roethlisberger
Carson Palmer
Steve McNair
Peyton Manning
Vince Young
Philip Rivers
In the NFC, the only solid starters are:
Drew Brees
Brett Favre
Eli Manning
Donovan McNabb (when he's not injured)
That's a 2:1 ratio. When you factor in QBs who are actually good, it looks a lot better for the AFC.
2007-05-13 13:45:45 · answer #3 · answered by MMM 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Because when the NFC was good they were not rebuilding for the future but the AFC kept on drafting early and improving there teams so when all the good players for the NFC retired the AFC caught up then eventually took oven as the NFL supreme conference
2007-05-13 13:13:09 · answer #4 · answered by mr.advice 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Power House Offense
2007-05-13 11:21:24 · answer #5 · answered by Brady 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it goes around the AFC are just the best conference at the moment
2007-05-13 13:16:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it goes in cycles in the 80s and early and mid 90s the nfc was dominate the niners cowboys and redskins were winning the super bowls look how bad some of their opponents looked in those games
2007-05-13 11:24:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
We just have better players. The AFC is more agressive in FA.
2007-05-13 11:20:53 · answer #8 · answered by Sixteen and Oh 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
IT IS JUST THEIR TIME.IF YOU REMEMBER BACK IN THE SEVENTIES IT WAS THE AFC,IN THE MID EIGHTIES TO THE LATE NINTIES IT WAS THE NFC.OTHER THAN THE RAMS AND THE BUCS ITS BEEN THE AFC IN THE 2000'S.IT'S JUST A CYCLE.
2007-05-13 11:39:01 · answer #9 · answered by blakkmajikk14 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I was around when people were asking the same question about the NFC! What comes around , goes around! The NFC will dominate again 1 day!
2007-05-13 11:31:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋