2007-05-13 03:45:41 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I CERTAINLY DON'T AGREE WITH THAT LINE OF THINKING!
2007-05-13 03:53:28 · update #1
Yes--using the logic of many people I have seen post on YA, Chelsea should be there.
I dont agree with the logic myself, but if one were to be consistent and authentic with one's beliefs they have posted here, that is the end result.
2007-05-13 03:49:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
It does no good to ask private citizens this question. Liberals and democrats will say bring them home and conservatives and republicans will say finish the job so they don't follow us here. The people you really need to ask are the men and women in uniform that are there and fighting. Some came home and volunteered to go back again because they believe in what they are doing. Remember that this is an all volunteer Army. The men and women fighting over there need to know that we support them particularly for morale reasons. It irritates me when someone says they do not believe in the war yet never served a day in the military, so what gives them the right? You truthfully need to ask them if they believe in what they are doing and want to finish the job. If you send them home now, will they be viewed by out enemies as being weak? Will it be viewed as a loss for America by the terroists? I personally believe that over 90% of the troops believe in their mission and in what they are doing and want to win. They want to come home to their family and friends with their heads held high with people proud of them and America. There is a reason they are called our fighting men and women and quitting or giving up is not really an option with them.
2016-05-17 07:04:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are a bit twisted. I'm afraid true lib logic says only Iraqis should be in Iraq. Neo-con and both-party fellow traveler logic says otherwise. Chelsea's choices and her mother's two-faced stance have nothing to do with liberalism or conservatism. Do not confuse either party, both of which are fully committed to the oil grab, with true liberal ideals, neither true conservative ideals.
2007-05-13 03:58:58 · answer #3 · answered by Madmunk 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Chelsea is too busy making money at a NYC financial firm with ties to contributions to her mother's reelection campaign.
Chelsea's salary is between $100,000, to $150,000. Not bad for a 26 year old.
Meanwhile the Bush kids have to make do with what the rest of us peons get - Jenna receives a school teacher's salary while the Barbara's last job involved peace corps work.
2007-05-13 04:05:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Well yes she should!
FRONT line even!!
but mommy will find a way to get her away from war just like daddy
like father like daughter like she male mother
2007-05-13 04:19:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Using that same logic,. I hope you're writing from Iraq yourself.
Supporting the troops means bringing them home. War is not a partisan issue.
2007-05-13 03:48:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
Remember, when Clinton was in office it was hands off the child by the Media.
2007-05-13 03:49:36 · answer #7 · answered by ? 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes, you would be correct. Lib logic is a scary thing isn't it. Although since Chelsea is one of their own, nothing pertains to her.
2007-05-13 03:54:35 · answer #8 · answered by TRUE PATRIOT 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
True, but you'll never get a lib to use logic
2007-05-13 03:49:09 · answer #9 · answered by DeuceRider 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
She'd be a very effective weapon, kinda like the Medusa. As butt ugly as she is, I'd lay down arms instead of having to face her.
2007-05-13 03:48:41 · answer #10 · answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋