Year after year it's the same old story, pick a group of talentless, self absorbed twerps. Give them a really awful load of rubbish to perform and expect them to win.
OK, we shouldn't take this contest to seriously, and the voting is a joke but do we have to make our nation a laughing stock too?
2007-05-13 01:34:39 · 14 answers · asked by Barrie G 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music ➔ Other - Music
Like: You are probably a nice person so why do I despair when I read replies such as your's.
2007-05-13 06:14:11 · update #1
At least it want Jordan
2007-05-13 01:38:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
What its to do with is: Is us mugs in the UK foot the bill for every country in the world when they have a crisis. We fight in wars to save countries that dont want us there. We are the first country to offer aid and aid-workers in any crisis. We home all the immigrants from all over Europe. Yet in the Eurovision all our continentel neighbours forget about this and cant even give us a point in a song contest. I bet there would be more people come forward to give us good points if it meant they got to live in this country.
2016-05-17 06:23:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because the programme hostess ignored Terry Wogan's announcement, and made a bad choice of her own.
But, don't take it too seriously, it is not going to affect global warming or the real world.
In any case, why should there be a need for voting and winners? After all, it is a failry reasonable 3 hours of musical entertainment, and does not need to pretend to be anything more.
2007-05-13 01:45:30 · answer #3 · answered by Rolf 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I want a percentage of my licence money back. I do not want to spend it on programmes where these people are voted for by the viewing public, or on the tasteless show which the eurovision contest has become.
2007-05-13 01:42:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We never win at anything - football, tennis (Henman is a joke) and even the Eurovision. We have no competitive streak in us - we are happy to be the hapless losers. It's so embarrassing.
2007-05-13 01:39:06 · answer #5 · answered by Bexs 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was rather like an alternative comedy show...
or The Young Ones, taking the pi$$ out of some cr@p group...
I'm sure all the 'straight' stewards on flights, simply adored the camp-it-up dark haired woofter...NOT!!!!
2007-05-13 01:42:58 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because we don't take Eurovision seriously, unlike other European countries. Ours was truly shocking, we didn't even go for the obvious rock theme that everyone else was doing.
2007-05-13 08:23:21 · answer #7 · answered by charles b 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Perhaps they fitted the Camp test- as in they were highly camp , outdated and a clone of the Euro-slums that take that Euro-bollocks seriously, and thus qualified
2007-05-13 01:41:11 · answer #8 · answered by Yer Acker I be 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
well to be fair it wouldn't really matter if we managed to pick an absolutely fantastic talented act because everyone hates us politically anyway.
Don't take it seriously, it's supposed to be a fun kitsch fest. Ukraine should have won!
2007-05-13 01:52:20 · answer #9 · answered by reniannen 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Twas an embarrasment..... But music doesn;t matter any more in the eurovision, it's whatever country is your neighbour or best friend.
2007-05-13 01:39:04 · answer #10 · answered by sacha_rb 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just another implosion in the pan.
Another one-flop-wonder.
Kinda reminds me of the that 'band' that 'sung' that song about fast food joints or somthing like that.
2007-05-13 01:43:24 · answer #11 · answered by g 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋