The complete answer to this question is indeed complicated but the basics are as follows.
A radioactive material used for nuclear medicine imaging should:
• emit a radiation that can be detected outside the body (usually x-rays or gamma rays)
• be relatively affordable
• be able to be put into the body easily (injection, inhalation, ingestion)
• mimic behavior of a biological material or be able to be ‘stuck to’ a biological material for a specific test (labeling)
• be nontoxic and nonallergenic or as low a toxicity as possible
• deliver the smallest possible dose to the body or target organ while delivering useful information (see next few items for dose minimization)
• be eliminated from the body as rapidly as possible (short biological half life) but not be a contamination problem
• decay quickly (short physical half life) but long enough to be produced and delivered to the exam site
2007-05-19 23:48:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by xxpat 1 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I beleive they are different radioactive isotopes. Isotopes that may be used for imaging may also be used for therapy.
Here are some useful terms:
http://www.medicalimaging.org/about/glossary.cfm
And by properties, do you mean which radionuclides are used for imaging? Most radionuclides or isotopes have something called a half life, how much time till the energy being released is cut in half, then in half again, and so on. We need an x-ray tech to answer this question for you... good luck
2007-05-13 01:41:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by MaDMaN 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Biological Properties Of Radionuclides
2016-10-19 02:38:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by spurgin 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
For the best answers, search on this site https://shorturl.im/ax4WR
Yes, it is wrong as it breaks the law. The law maybe wrong but breaking the law does not make it right. I feel that Marijuana is a drug that should be legal, with all it's regulations put in place and I do believe it will happen sometime in the future. However, until the drug companies and the Government can get together on how this is to be done it won't happen. See the Government want to regulate it with some very steep taxes and the drug companies want it too but want it to compete with the now drugs that do the same, in different form. They want their profit, but it's so easy to grow and how to control. I don't do drugs but Marijuana is a plant and many of our very best drugs are derived from plants, so what is the difference? Marijuana processing will be hard to control. But even taxing it at a premium would yield a lower price to the consumer, but until we get over the debates and the control, it's not going to happen.
2016-04-03 10:36:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
your question demands a very long answer and is the matter of radiobiology course
However i would remark
The radionuclde must be specific of an organ. Example : Iodine is absorbed by thyroid so the radioisotope I131 can be used to scan the thyroid
The radioisotope must have a half life which is not too long ,since as radiations are harmful a long half life is damaging for healthy tissues
more with my link
2007-05-13 02:34:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by maussy 7
·
0⤊
0⤋