2007-05-11 14:55:49 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
The invading countries---US, UK and to a limited extent other allies that sent token troop assistance. There would not be a war if the US and UK had not invaded. Both nations controlled well over a third of Iraq for over 10 years (remember the no fly zones in the south and north in the 1990's) so any claims that Saddam had a massive army and equipment was completely ridiculous; we blew up anything that moved over that 10 year period.
2007-05-11 15:59:14 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Conservatives for
arming and funding Saddam
arming and funding Bin Laden
attacking instead of diplomacy
and before some Fox Snooze groupie starts politicizing 9/11 remember that Reagan attacked Grenada and Bush 1 attacked panama, etc etc etc years ago..
2007-05-11 22:07:15 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
The Middle East is because when the U.S.A captured Sadam Huesain the insurgents got angry and blew up the Twin Towers, which promted us to go back to war with the Middle East.
2007-05-11 22:02:19 · answer #3 · answered by natedgs94 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
The arabs are infinite and have nothing better to do.
We were in their land and 'petrocentric' so they rebelled as only they know how.
There will be no victor and it's worse than a war.
Fault?.....Flip a coin.
2007-05-11 23:04:20 · answer #4 · answered by Rhinorm 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Abraham. He slept with Sara's handmaid. He had a son. They were sent away. God gave him some land but said there would always be conflict.
2007-05-11 22:05:51 · answer #5 · answered by TAT 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
It doesn't matter. The most important thing is to prevent it, not to look for someone to blame.
2007-05-11 21:58:48 · answer #6 · answered by Thomas B 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋