What advance knowledge did he have, and who gave it to him? Did he know exactly what would happen and when it would happen? Is there any evidence to back up your opinion on this?
2007-05-11 13:53:11 · 22 answers · asked by kscottmccormick 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
yes of course he did.. (I'm not a dem. btw..)
1. (out of bush's own mouth) he said that he witnessed the first plane hit the first tower while in the hallway of the school he was in... This could not be possible unless he knew of what was going to happen as their wasn't live coverage of the first tower... (that particular video of the hit on the first tower was discovered several hours after the fact...(also, the man was not at the school during the first hit.. he was on route.. in the limo..
his brother took care of security for the airport involved, along with security for the world trade center..
There was a power down in the building several week before the fact.. (power down is when electricity was completed turned off.. they had no security during this time.. (people reported men running cables through the building during this power down)
bomb sniffing dogs removed from the towers five days prior to 911
metal does not melt with jet fuel... Yet there was molten metal in the sub-level floors of all three towers..
the buildings( all three) came down at free fall speed... impossible in the official story of a pancake collapse).
several reports. including a reporter who stated that it was not a commercial airliner as "it had no windows"
the metal from the building was quickly gathered and shipped overseas for recycling without any testing being done.. (that's tampering with evidence and it's a CRIME)
world trade 7... no plane and yet it also collapsed..
flight 93 ...... just a hole in the ground... no wreckage.. no bodies... no luggage.... no nothing...
pentagon.. impossible for a 757 to fly two feet above ground while hitting several light posts and yet continued it's tidy path onward towards the pentagon and leaving behind a hole that was way too small for the 757 to fit through... again.. no luggage... bodies from the plane etc.
also the FBI confiscated all security video the a gas station nearby and a hotel.. within minutes these videos were confiscated... (if they weren't hiding anything why would they do this?)...
I could go on forever with this.. and anyone with half a brain could see that the official story is a farce...
2007-05-11 14:17:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yes, there was knowledge that something was going to happen. The details were not clear as to where, exact date, what type of terror was going to be unleashed on America. Since they didn't know just what was going to happen, even if they did know where, New York City is a big place, one would naturally think it would be government buildings or officials that were going to be the target, never did anyone have a clue as to what was really going to happen. We really can't lay all of the blame on Bush for this one, it would have happened no matter who was President.
The problem here is that we don't seem to be any more prepared now than we were then, even though we did manage to stop the shootings at Fort Dix! It was an on going investigation that a civilian reported to the FBI, that tipped them off. For some reason Our government doesn't seem to be able to solve too many threats on their own, maybe its time to do some problem solving from within.
2007-05-11 14:09:32 · answer #2 · answered by geegee 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm a Democrat...Bush was given a report from the CIA that indicated a terrorist attack was very likely to ocurr. The debate remains as to whether any specifics were known. Overall, I am torn on saying Bush had advanced knowledge of 9/11. I don't agree with Bush's ideology, however he's not a monster. Only a monster would be able to stand by and watch his country suffer the horrible atrocity that ocurred on 9/11.
2007-05-11 14:00:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Bush is a member of a world globalist Order known as Skull and Bones. Skull and Bones is just one of many Zionist fronts. 9-11 was carried out by the Zionists and blamed on Islam so that Americans would back a Middle East invasion by the military. Of course Bush was involved, as were members of his Administration, Congress, the media, and the Pentagon.
I believe most of our Federal Government is made up of either rabid globalist Zionists or dual-citizen Israelis.
2007-05-11 14:10:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
In the 50's a Radio show with Orson Wells, called "War of the Worlds" had half of America running for shelter and in Panic as they were convinced the Martians were attacking. No joke. And this was on His Weekly Radio Show.
There have been several remakes of this in movies since.
What do I think?
It scares and saddens me that a group of people would really be that gullible and full of hate. I do not think there are any real Democrats or Polititians who would stake their reputation on that. That would be a "War Crime" and Pelosi and Reed would have already had Bush out.
If those folks believe it? Yikes!!! Because for all the rhetoric and posturing, Democrat leaders know that it's not true.
2007-05-11 14:04:58 · answer #5 · answered by Ken C 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
What do you mean by advance knowledge?
Did he know that it was likely that Al Queda would try to attack us? Probably.
Did he know that the attack would be using hijacked planes? Maybe.
Did he know that the attack was going to occur in New York and Washington? Unlikely.
Did he know that the attack was going to occur on the morning of September 11, 2001? Impossible.
Like Pearl Harbor, there were signs that we would be attacked but too many questions remained to prevent the attack. We really did not know when, where, and how we would be attacked, therefore we could not effectively prevent it from occuring.
2007-05-11 14:07:27 · answer #6 · answered by msi_cord 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes. Sort of actually, I dont really think Bush is all that important. He had an "oh crap they really did it look" on his face when he was told about it. Without 9-11 they never would have gotten authorization to use military force against Iraq and they were after that from the time he took office. I personally don't think Bush knew much, I tend to think they keep him out of the loop as much as possible.
2007-05-11 13:57:21 · answer #7 · answered by Stephanie is awesome!! 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
What "majority" are you talking approximately. The "majority" you bypass the pipe around with? Cheney did not "subvert" the regulation. Our regulation replaced into subverted whilst Clinton's assistant legal expert familiar set up a wall between the intelligence gatherers and the regulation enforcement branches of the government. he did not "stand down" our air defenses. Our Air protection command basically has radar coverage on the methods, staring at for incoming threats. The FAA controls air trip in the rustic. the those that knew the attack replaced into coming knew in 1996 and did not supply an sufficient warning to President Bush and his human beings.
2016-10-04 22:33:01 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have a suspicion that that is true. For one main reason. NORAD (North American Aerospace Defence Command). Their pre 9-11 response time to emergencies was 7 minutes. And yet, on 9-11, four airplanes were hijacked and 75% of targets were hit during a period of a few hours and NORAD had no response at all.
That makes me suspicious. As does the fact that the twin towers fell at free-fall speed, which no building in history has ever done when hit by an airplane. Those towers were built to withstand almost anything, that they crumbled so easily also makes me suspicious, and building 5 collapsing later on that day also raises some questions in my mind.
2007-05-11 14:04:11 · answer #9 · answered by Jesus W. 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
What poll? Sounds a bit crazy.
Did he have advance knowledge that terrorists might fly planes into buildings, yes.
Did he know when an attack would take place, or if they would really use planes, no.
2007-05-11 13:58:36 · answer #10 · answered by x2000 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋