live to the age of 100 in good health, which would you choose?
2007-05-11 13:26:04 · 37 answers · asked by flipdout2 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Since B. Marie asked, my choice would be to live to 100. I'm afraid if I received the 50mil, I would drop dead of a heart attack.
2007-05-11 13:38:15 · update #1
100 in good health
2007-05-11 13:31:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'll take the money. If I had the $50 million I could afford the best in health care which might help me live to 100
2007-05-11 13:28:35 · answer #2 · answered by Mrs J 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
100
2007-05-11 13:28:38 · answer #3 · answered by luckford2004 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I would live in good health to the age of 100
2007-05-11 13:34:10 · answer #4 · answered by yidlmama 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Live to the age of 100 in good health.
2007-05-11 13:28:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Take the 50 million and live to 99 in good health.
2007-05-11 13:28:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I would definantly choose the 50 million dollars.
Not like I'm greedy or something, but living that long can sometimes be just plain misery, because you could get back pain and things.
2007-05-11 13:31:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'll take the money...tell you why...
MY life...is just that..it is mine...it AT BEST will influence around 3-4 generations...
the money can pay for college tuitions for several generations. Life isn't about money...but.. I don't care if I get to 100 or not...I'd rather see my kids and grandkids live successful lives and if I can get them the education they deserve...then I prefer to do that..
2007-05-11 13:30:52 · answer #8 · answered by juanes addicion 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
50 million
2007-05-11 13:28:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The good health part. I don't care if I live to be a hundred, and the money has no value without health.
2007-05-11 13:28:53 · answer #10 · answered by Firespider 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋