The question was "stretch marks..."?

Question

My answer was "yep, I got'em"
This was reported as abuse, do you belive it should have been?
If so help me understand why.

Answer 1

No, that's retarded. I believe they are going heavy on violation these days.

Answer 2

I sympathize. Considering some of the questions being posted right now, that was pretty tame.

The community guidelines seem to be getting stricter all the time. You may have been reported by a troll.

Try to appeal it, it may work.

Answer 3

what the heck? You know women and stretch marks some can be really touchy. No. Why didn't the person asking the question reported.

Answer 4

Having stretch marks is a violation.

Answer 5

Today is a crazy day on here, they are going crazy....I got reported for asking "Ladies and Gents....Can I have this dance? What song should we dance to?"
Keep your head up you're not the only one :)

Answer 6

<> No. God's Truth is what it is, and the Catholic Church teaches God's Truth. < Bible REALLY teaches?>> No, not at all. Perhaps the Catechism offends your idea of what God's Truth should be, but the Catechism doesn't offend God's Truth as it is. < and the Bible.">> He's right. < the Catholic Church.>> He's right. You have to understand that Scripture is originally written for one's contemporaries. The author penning Scriptures at the time KNEW of the Assumption of Mary, and also KNEW that his readers would KNOW of it as well. Hence, there's no point in detailing something that everyone already KNEW, and most likely witnessed, themselves. Besides, your comment, "fact specifically states that "flesh and blood" CANNOT attain the kingdom of God" is NOT 'fact'. It's a falesy, and a blatant one at that! There are A NUMBER of DIRECT Biblical acounts of people being assumed Body and Soul into Heaven. With that in mind, this makes the Assumption of Mary, quite frankly, NOT that big of a deal. Gen. 5:24, Heb. 11:5 - Enoch was bodily assumed into heaven without dying. Would God do any less for Mary the Ark of the New Covenant? 2 Kings 2:11-12; 1 Mac 2:58 - Elijah was assumed into heaven in fiery chariot. Jesus would not do any less for His Blessed Mother. Psalm 132:8 - Arise, O Lord, and go to thy resting place, thou and the Ark (Mary) of thy might. Both Jesus and Mary were taken up to their eternal resting place in heaven. 2 Cor. 12:2 - Paul speaks of a man in Christ who was caught up to the third heaven. Mary was also brought up into heaven by God. Matt. 27:52-53 - when Jesus died and rose, the bodies of the saints were raised. Nothing in Scripture precludes Mary's assumption into heaven. 1 Thess. 4:17 - we shall be caught up in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air and so we shall always be with the Lord. Rev. 12:1 - we see Mary, the "woman," clothed with the sun. While in Rev. 6:9 we only see the souls of the martyrs in heaven, in Rev. 12:1 we see Mary, both body and soul. 2 Thess. 2:15 - Paul instructs us to hold fast to oral (not just written) tradition. Apostolic tradition says Mary was assumed into heaven. While claiming the bones of the saints was a common practice during these times (and would have been especially important to obtain Mary's bones as she was the Mother of God), Mary's bones were never claimed. This is because they were not available. Mary was taken up body and soul into heaven. < within the Catechism?>> No, you don't know. You're not a Catholic. You don't know Catholicism. Ironically, it's you NON-Catholics who have this fixation with Mary, not us Catholics. All that Mary-fixations that your ilk attempts to place on us Catholics, that's really just an ugly mirror image of your fixations that you're attempting to, in vain, project on to us Catholics. Scripture simply does NOT substantiate you ideals

Answer 7

My kids totally violated my body by giving them to me..but on Y/A..totally NOT a violation.

Answer 8

no, I think thats stupid. Alot of things get reported that shouldn't be.

(PS: I got some too)

Answer 9

Ah man......I have them too, are they going to report me? That did not make very much sense.

Answer 10

No I don't believe it should have been but yahoo thinks different.